Dlf
Latest Judgments
Total 1989 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf.
DLF HGomes Panchkula Private Limited V/S Mrs. Renu Goel
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain, Shubham Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:811 of 2016Date of Institution:16.11.2016Date of Decision:16.02.2017Mrs. Renu Goel wife of Shri Satish Goel, resident of House No.1132, Sector-7, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panc...
Case Number: 811
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Private Ltd. V/S Mridula Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:821 of 2016Date of Institution:17.11.2016Date of Decision:16.02.2017Mridula Sood W/o Late Sh. Omkar Dev Sood R/o Sarswati Bhawan, North Oak, Sanjauli, Distt. Shimla HP. .........Complainant. VersusDL...
Case Number: 821
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd, V/S Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Kamal Jit Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Ms. Sapna Seth, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the Opposite Parties, which is taken on record. She seeks time to file reply and evidence on behalf of the Opposite Parties. At this stage, Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants states that on accoun...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
M/s DLF Universal Ltd. V/S Smt. Minakshi Arora
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
It is stated at the bar by the Counsel for the decree holders that against the order under execution, the Judgment Debtors have gone in appeal wherein vide order dated 09.02.2017, on deposit of principal amount with interest, execution has been stayed. In view of above, Counsel...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
M/s DLF Universal Ltd. V/S Uma Shankar Trivedi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated at the bar by the Counsel for the decree holders that against the order under execution, the Judgment Debtors have gone in appeal wherein vide order dated 09.02.2017, on deposit of principal amount with interest, execution has been stayed. In view of above, Counsel...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
M/s DLF Universal Ltd. V/S Hima Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/169/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/414/20161. Hima SoodChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s DLF Universal Ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRE...
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Rajesh Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ranjan Lohan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vide order dated 24.11.2016, compliant pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula was withdrawn with liberty to file it before the appropriate authority/court. Instead of filing that complaint before Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissi...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
DLF Pramerica LIC Ltd. V/S Jagsir Singh
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Vipan Kumar Tayal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 151Date of Institution: 01.06.2016Date of Decision : 14.02.2017Jagsir Singh aged about 62 years s/o Bhagwan Singh r/o Muktsar Road, Mohalla Govind Pura, Near PSB Road, Kotkapura, District Faridkot....ComplainantV...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2017
M/s DLF India Limited V/S Sh. Rajbir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashok Tyagi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the Judgment Debtors that against the order under execution the Judgment Debtors filed an appeal baring No.766 of 2016, in which, the following order was passed on 25.01.2017 :-“The learned counsel for the appellants wants a short adjournment to ...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited V/S Dr. Raj Pal Sangwan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasbir Singh Punia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the competent Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charg...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.