Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:799 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:27.02.2017Dr. M. C. Sood S/o Late Sh. Badari Prasad Sood, D-4, Parasdas Garden, Near CPRI, Shimla. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panc...
Case Number: 799
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:850 of 2016Date of Institution:28.11.2016Date of Decision:27.02.2017Kamal Raj Aggarwal S/o Sh. Ram Gopal,Anita W/o Kamal Raj Aggarwal,Both R/o H.No.LIG 17, Sector-3, Parwanoo, Himachal Pradesh. ........
Case Number: 850
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:851 of 2016Date of Institution:28.11.2016Date of Decision:27.02.2017Raj Kumari Thakur W/o Sh. Jagdish Chand, Aadi-ish, Power House Road, Saproon, Solan Pin-173211. .........Complainant.VersusDLF Home...
Case Number: 851
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:852 of 2016Date of Institution:28.11.2016Date of Decision:27.02.2017Dinesh Singh S/o Sh. Satyavir Singh R/o House No.17, Sector-4, Rohtak-124001. .........Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Priva...
Case Number: 852
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Navin Kapur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In the face of ratio of judgment passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the case of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., Consumer Case No.97 of 2016, decided on 07.10.2016 and looking to the cost o...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AR Takkar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This application has been moved by the applicants/Opposite Parties under Section 5 & 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the matter to Arbitration. The applicability of the arbitration process will be seen at the time of final arguments in the main c...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2017
Court Name: Morena
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:795 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:16.02.2017Sandeep Sharma son of Sh. Yash Pal Sharma R/o Flat No.B-42, Spangle Condos, Ghazipur, Zirakpur. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Hom...
Case Number: 795
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:797 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:16.02.2017Veena Gupta W/o Sh. Satya Pal Gupta, H.No.857, Sector – 9, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Private...
Case Number: 797
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:798 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:16.02.2017Ankit Sachdeva S/o Sh. Anup Sachdeva, H.No.466, Sector-2, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Private Limite...
Case Number: 798
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.