Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:920 of 2016Date of Institution:14.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Ramesh Chandra Arora S/o Late Sh. T. C. Arora R/o House No.452, Sector-7, Panchkula.Vigyan Arora, S/o Sh. R. C. Arora R/o House No.4...
Case Number: 920
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:922 of 2016Date of Institution:14.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Maj. Gen. Harinder Singh son of Shri Gurnam Singh R/o HQ 28 INF Division, PIN – 908428 C/o 56 APO.Mrs. Gurpreet Kaur wife of M...
Case Number: 922
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:923 of 2016Date of Institution:14.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Monika Rana W/o Maj. Atul Bali R/o Om Villa, Near HP Co-op Bank, Tehsil Shimla. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pri...
Case Number: 923
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:939 of 2016Date of Institution:20.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Col. Lawinder Singh Raizada S/o Col. (Retd.) Partap Singh,Rinku Rana W/o Col. Lawinder Singh Raizada,Both R/o VOP Dangoli, Una. ......
Case Number: 939
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:943 of 2016Date of Institution:20.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Sangeeta Aggarwal W/o Sh. Arvind Kr. Aggarwal R/o Flat No.1264/6, Near Aggarwal Dharamshala, Ambala City, Ambala. .........Complain...
Case Number: 943
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Nehra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:954 of 2016Date of Institution:21.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Colonel Anil Chaudhary (now Major General) son of Ch. Inder Singh, resident of House No.L-173, Army Flats, Sector-4, MDC, Panchkula ...
Case Number: 954
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Nehra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:955 of 2016Date of Institution:21.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Col. Gurbrinder Singh Virk son of Shri Gurdeep Singh Virk r/o House No.5738, MHC, Manimajra, Chandigarh.Paramjeet Kaur Virk w/o Col....
Case Number: 955
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:973 of 2016Date of Institution:29.12.2016Date of Decision:23.03.2017Sudesh Nagpal W/o Sh. Ashok Nagpal,Aparna Nagpal D/o Sh. Ashok Nagpal,Both R/o H.No.1211, Second Floor, Sector – 18C, Chandiga...
Case Number: 973
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: Dhamtari
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVESH PRAJAPATI
Respondant Advocate MR. SHRIJAN SHUKLA
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In this complaint, the following prayer has been made :-“A) To direct Opposite Party to give physical possession of plot immediately and further be directed to withdraw illegal and excessive demands on account ofClause I (b) :- EDC (illegal and arbitrarily increase of rate...
Case Number: 231
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.