Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jigyasa Tanwar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Copy of letter dated 05.04.2017 has been placed on record. The said letter is addressed to the complainant, in which, it is stated by the Opposite Parties that towards full and final settlement of all claims of the complainant, the Opposite Parties will pay an amount of Rs.92,20,...
Case Number: 967
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jigyasa Tanwar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Copy of letter dated 05.04.2017 has been placed on record. The said letter is addressed to the complainants, in which, it is stated by the Opposite Parties that towards full and final settlement of all claims of the complainants, the Opposite Parties will pay an amount of Rs.75,8...
Case Number: 984
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:674 of 2016Date of Institution:04.10.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Lt. Gen. Rajinder Singh S/o Shri Dalip Singh R/o Flat No.1, Brahamputra Apartments, Sector 29, Arun Vihar, Noida – 201301.Mrs....
Case Number: 674
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:790 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Mrs. Saveena Goel W/o Shri Rakesh Goel R/o House No.148/11, Tarana Hill, Mandi – 175001, Himachal Pradesh, India.Mr. Rakesh Go...
Case Number: 790
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:836 of 2016Date of Institution:22.11.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Sh. Abhishek Raghuvanshi S/o Maj. Gen. (Retd.), M. P. Singh R/o House No.240-A, Sector 2, Panchkula 134112. .........Complainant. V...
Case Number: 836
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:837 of 2016Date of Institution:22.11.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M. P. Singh S/o Late Shri Jang Bahadur Singh R/o House No.240A, Sector 2, Panchkula 134112.Ms. Smriti Kanwar D/o M...
Case Number: 837
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:838 of 2016Date of Institution:22.11.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Ms. Smriti Kanwar D/o Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M. P. Singh R/o House No.240A, Sector 2, Panchkula 134112. .........Complainant. VersusDLF ...
Case Number: 838
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:978 of 2016Date of Institution:29.12.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Seema Goyal W/o Sanjay Kumar Bansal,Sanjay Kumar Bansal S/o Ram Kumar Bansal,Both R/o Flat No.401, Xynthia Tower, Bollywood HT, Peer...
Case Number: 978
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
Cost of Rs.500/- imposed on the last date of hearing has been deposited by the complainant in the Consumer Legal Aid Account vide receipt dated 30.03.2017 placed on record. Under order passed by this Commission on 09.01.2017, possession already stood delivered in favour of the co...
Case Number: 663
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jigyasa Tanwar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Raj Kumar Chauhan, complainant that the matter has since been settled between the parties and the Opposite Parties have agreed to pay an amount of Rs.97,06,630.14 through demand draft to him. It is further stated that the settlement deed has also been signed. ...
Case Number: 887
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.