Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:980 of 2016Date of Institution:29.12.2016Date of Decision:12.04.2017Mohinder Singh S/o Sh. Kehar Singh R/o H.No.642-B, R.C.F.T-II, Hussainpur, K.P.T., Punjab.…..Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Pan...
Case Number: 980
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:981 of 2016Date of Institution:29.12.2016Date of Decision:12.04.2017Avinash Chander Mehta S/o Sh. Bashamber Dass Mehta, Flat No.101, GHS-32, Sector-20, Panchkula, Haryana.….Complainant. VersusD...
Case Number: 981
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:51 of 2017Date of Institution:18.01.2017Date of Decision:12.04.2017Lt. Col. Vishal Mahajan S/o Satish Kumar Mahajan,Shikha Mahajan W/o Lt. Col. Vishal Mahajan,Both R/o #55, FAFA Colony, Bhim Road, Jal...
Case Number: 51
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:54 of 2017Date of Institution:18.01.2017Date of Decision:12.04.2017Col. Vishal Madhok S/o Lt. Col. D. B. Madhok (Retd.) R/o H.No.3026, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh – 160022.….Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited, SCO 19...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhankar Baweja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:953 of 2016Date of Institution:21.12.2016Date of Decision:12.04.2017Surender Bairagi son of Sh. Yudhishter Singh,Pushpa wife of Sh. Surender Bairagi,Both residents of House No.2097, Sector 27-C, Chand...
Case Number: 953
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Robin Sathi,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:958 of 2016Date of Institution:22.12.2016Date of Decision:12.04.2017Satpal Singh, aged about ___ years, son of Late Shri Mam Chand, resident of House No.631, Sector 13-17, Panipat at present SDM Resid...
Case Number: 958
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Robin Sathi,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:960 of 2016Date of Institution:19.12.2016Date of Decision:12.04.2017Rajinder Sharma, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Pyare Lal Sharma, resident of House No.20640, Ajit Road, Street No.26/2, Bathinda ...
Case Number: 960
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunil K Dixit, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After hearing arguments, we are of the opinion that the issues raised are as such that those can be settled between the parties on a representation filed by the complainants. Let the complainants file a detailed representation claiming the relief, which is claimed before this Co...
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Nehra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants wishes to withdraw this Execution Application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the Execution Application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy b...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:812 of 2016Date of Institution:17.11.2016Date of Decision:05.04.2017Kapil Kumar Khosla S/o Sh. Kishan Chand Khosla;Rashmi Khosla W/o Sh. Kapil Kumar, Khosla;Both R/o Partap Bazar, Vaishno Market, Amri...
Case Number: 812
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.