Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 806
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 807
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 808
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 809
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:830 of 2016Date of Institution:21.11.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Saroj Tomar wife of Suresh Tomar R/o House No.113/31, Ashok Vihar, Gohana Road, Sonipat. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panc...
Case Number: 830
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:832 of 2016Date of Institution:21.11.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Jagdeep Singh son of Late Sh.Balbir Singh, permanent resident of VPO Rajpura, District Jind, Haryana, at present resident of House N...
Case Number: 832
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kshitij Sharma,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:842 of 2016Date of Institution:25.11.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Mrs. Tara Sharma wife of Mr.Atul Singla, aged about 35 years.Correspondence Address:- House No.291, Sector 21A, Chandigarh. .........
Case Number: 842
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh, adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:869 of 2016Date of Institution:30.11.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Lt. Col. Joginder Singh son of Sh.Hoshiar Singh aged 40 years.Sushma wife of Lt. Col. Joginder Singh, aged 38 years, both residents ...
Case Number: 869
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal & Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:876 of 2016Date of Institution:01.12.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Brig. Lokesh Diwan Minocha son of Late Shri Dharam Shil Minocha, R/o C/O Maj. Gen. (Retd.) MP Singh, House No.240-A, Sector 2, Panch...
Case Number: 876
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:889 of 2016Date of Institution:06.12.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Vandit Barak Son of Late Sh.Dilbag Singh, R/o H.No.160, Sector 4, Rohtak. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Private L...
Case Number: 889
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.