Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NP Sharma , Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:883 of 2016Date of Institution:02.12.2016Date of Decision:27.04.2017Col. Daljit Singh S/o Late Shri Nirmal Singh, Aged about 53 years, R/o Flat No.204/E-7, Group Housing Society No.79, Sector 20, Panc...
Case Number: 883
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:931 of 2016Date of Institution:16.12.2016Date of Decision:27.04.2017Maj. Vijay Chowdhary son of Sh. Baldev Singh Chowdhary presently posted with 5 Ladakh Scouts C/o 56 APO-910355.Baldev Chowdhary son ...
Case Number: 931
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2017
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/64/20141. Mr. K. Prabhakara S/o. Late Kantha Aged 68 years R/at Shreekanth Southerpeta Road Kankanady Mangalore 575002...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. SBI Cards DLF Infinity TowersTower C 10th. 12th Floor Block 2 Building 3 DLF Cyber City...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:737 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Yogesh son of Sh.Daya Kishan, resident of House No.242, Friends Colony, Kharkari Road, Bhiwani, District Bhiwani. .........Complain...
Case Number: 737
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Nehra,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:773 of 2016Date of Institution:07.11.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Surjeet Singh son of Ch.Balbir Chand.Dr.Saroj Surjeet Singh wife of Surjeet Singh.Both residents of House No.8/29, New Campus, CCS H...
Case Number: 773
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv,
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:779 of 2016Date of Institution:08.11.2016Date of Decision:21.04.2017Lt. Col. Amit Sharma son of Dr.S.D. SharmaMrs.Ruchika Sharma wife of Lt.Col.Amit Sharma.Presently at 92, Base Hospital, C/o 56 APO. ...
Case Number: 779
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 800
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 801
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. ...
Case Number: 804
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint stating that the matter stands settled between the parties. To the statement made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel for the Opposite Parties. In view of above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Ce...
Case Number: 805
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.