Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:100 of 2017Date of Institution:01.02.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Sidharth Jhinjha son of Vijay Singh R/o House No.22, Amravati Enclave, P.O. Surajpur, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana. .........Complaina...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:101 of 2017Date of Institution:01.02.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Vijay Laxmi Bhadoo W/o Late Mr. Bhoj Raj Bhadoo, resident of VPO Waryam Khera, The. Abohar, Distt. Feropzpur. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:32 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Kavita Devi wife of Amar Nath R/o House No.73, Nyaypuri, Karnal – 132001. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Homes Panchkula ...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:33 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Promila Dhindsa wife of Abhishek Dhindsa, resident of House No.1402, Sector 1, HUDA, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra.Abhishek Dhindsa ...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:34 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Tanveer Narwal son of Dilawar Singh resident of House No.350, Sector 14, Urban Estate, Karnal. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF H...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:35 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Dharam Raj Dangi son of Sh. Dharamvir Dangi resident of VPO Madina, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak. .........Complainant. VersusM/s D...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:36 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Wg. Cdr. Punam Bhardwaj S/o Krishan Lal Bhardwaj R/o H.No.3358, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh – 160022. .........Complainant. Versus...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:39 of 2017Date of Institution:13.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Lt. Col. S. S. Ranot son of Sh. Baldev Singh Ranot, resident of Flat No.E-13-103, Sandeep Vihar, GH-79, Sector 20, District Panchkula...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:40 of 2017Date of Institution:13.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Smt. Sarla Seth aged about 92 years wife of Late CDR Narendra Nath Seth resident of D-124, Defence Colony, New Delhi – 110024.S...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:5 of 2017Date of Institution:03.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Anmol Singh Alagh s/o Sh. Taranjeet Singh Alagh r/o House No.544A, Sushant Lok-1, Gurgaon, Haryana.Sh. Taranjna Alagh w/o Sh. Anmol Si...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.