Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhank Baweja Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:841 of 2016Date of Institution:23.11.2016Date of Decision:11.07.2017Dharmpal S/o Sh. Shiv Lal resident of House No.264, Sector 2, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.,...
Case Number: 841
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:90 of 2017Date of Institution:27.01.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Parveen Kumar Kamboj S/o Hari Singh, R/o #48, Dinesh Nagar, Near Power House, Babyal Vill, Ambala Cantt-133005, Haryana. .........Co...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 6/7/2017ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for th...
Case Number: 512
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Deep Goel
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/967/2016Date of Institution:24/10/2016Date of Decision:06/07/2017Rahul Deswal s/o Zile Singh Deswal resident of House No.241, Sector 6, MDC, Panchkula.…..ComplainantV E R S U SAero Club,...
Case Number: 967
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 5/7/2017ORDER It is stated by Counsel for the complainant that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. In view of that, he wishes to withdraw this complaint. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties, free of charge....
Case Number: 802
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 5/7/2017ORDER It is stated by Counsel for the complainant that amicable settlement of dispute is virtually at the final stage and let this complaint be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file it again, if settlement fails. Liberty granted. In view of above, this comp...
Case Number: 803
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SHEENU SURA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.120 of 2016 Date of Institution: 11.05.2016 Date of Decision: 05.07.2017Mrs. Neelima Singh W/o Mr. Maninder Singh R/o L-173, Army Flats, Sector-4, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula.…..ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 13/06/2017ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars before the competent Forum/Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as w...
Case Number: 417
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Parveen Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party states that in terms of ratio of judgment passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the case of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., Consumer C...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Counsel for the Opposite Parties by making reference to the ratio of judgment passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the case of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., Consume...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.