Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sumit Narang, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:957 of 2016Date of Institution:22.12.2016Date of Decision:18.07.2017Rehana Anjum W/o Mr. Rizwan Ahmad R/o Flat No.303, GH-23, Sector-20, Panchkula (Haryan.a). .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Home...
Case Number: 957
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:977 of 2016Date of Institution:29.12.2016Date of Decision:18.07.2017WG CDR Pushpa Chauhan W/o WG CDR Mukesh Kumar Chauhan,WG CDR Mukesh Kumar Chauhan S/o Sh. Virendra Singh Chauhan,Both R/o H.No.25D, ...
Case Number: 977
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhishek S Bhaskar,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:10 of 2017Date of Institution:04.01.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Col. Balwinder Singh Sandhu S/o Sh. Lal Singh, Resident of House No.503, Tower No.18, Royal Estates, Zirakpur, District Mohali (Punja...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:175 of 2017Date of Institution:27.02.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Dilbag Singh Deswal Son of Sh. Balwant Singh Deswal resident of H.No.184, Sector-8, Near BSNL Office, Karnal. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:175 of 2017Date of Institution:27.02.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Dilbag Singh Deswal Son of Sh. Balwant Singh Deswal resident of H.No.184, Sector-8, Near BSNL Office, Karnal. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sumit Narang, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:191 of 2017Date of Institution:03.03.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Sukhdev Singh Nain S/o Sh. Molar Ram Nain, R/o Transit Flat No.39, Sector-12 A, Panchkula.Santosh Kumari Nain W/o Sukhdev Singh Nain...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:193 of 2017Date of Institution:03.03.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Suraj Mal, R/o #353/16, Friends Colony, Gurgaon, Haryana. .........Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. SCO No.190-191-1...
Case Number: 193
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:195 of 2017Date of Institution:07.03.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Krishna Beniwal,Mandeep son of P.S. BeniwalBoth are Resident of House No.2122 Urban Estate Jind (Haryana). .........Complainants. V...
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sumit Narang, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:200 of 2017Date of Institution:07.03.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Manjit Singh Nain S/o Sh. Bhag Singh Nain, R/o House No.1364, Sector-21, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Homes Panch...
Case Number: 200
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:84 of 2017Date of Institution:25.01.2017Date of Decision:11.07.2017Major Sunil Dagar son of Late Sh. Satbir Singh, R/o H.No.177-F, Amrawati Enclave, Pinjore, Panchkula, Haryana. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.