Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:127 of 2017Date of Institution:13.2.2017Date of Decision:25.07.2017Lt. Col. Gaurav Kapur S/o Sh. Bhupinder Kapur, 268, ENGR. REGT., C/o 56 APO, India. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula ...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 528 OF 2017Rajinder Paul Sharma and ors. Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. and anr. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Naveen Sheokand, Counsel for Com...
Case Number: 528
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bhuwan Vats
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.:138 of 2017Date of Institution:19.05.2017Date of Decision:19.07.2017A.P. Arora, r/o #427, Sector 37-A, Chandigarh.……Appellant/ComplainantV e r s u sDLF Universal Ltd., DLF Center, Sansad ...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Hitinder Singh Lalli, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:205 of 2017Date of Institution:08.03.2017Date of Decision:19.07.2017Shamsher Singh Sandhu, S/o Sh.Sarabjit Singh Sandhu, R/o House No.233, Sector 18-A, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s u...
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:295 of 2017Date of Institution:06.04.2017Date of Decision:19.07.2017Mrs.Anjani Dass w/o Dr.Ramesh Manmohan Dass, H.No.2194, Sector 15-C, Chandigarh.Rajeev Chhibber S/o Bal Krishan Chhiber, H.No.2194, ...
Case Number: 295
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:146 of 2017Date of Institution:15.02.2017Date of Decision:18.07.2017Prem Banga son of late Sh. D.R.BangaYashodha Banga wife of Sh. Prem BangaBoth residents of Banga’s House, Rabon P.O. Seproon, ...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:156 of 2017Date of Institution:20.02.2017Date of Decision:18.07.2017Brig Indrajeet Singh Gakhal, S/o Late Col. Gurmohan Singh VSM, resident of House No.1071, Sector-2, Panchkula-134102, Haryana.Mrs. P...
Case Number: 156
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:217 of 2017Date of Institution:15.03.2017Date of Decision:18.07.2017Vishal Gupta Son of Sh. R.P.Gupta Resident of SCF No.42, Sector 8 Panchkula (Haryana).Geeta Singla Wife of Sh. Surinder K Singla Res...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:53 of 2017Date of Institution:18.01.2017Date of Decision:18.07.2017Rajinder Singh S/o Sh. Dai Ram, R/o H.No.19, Sector-8, Karnal. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO 190-19...
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:06 of 2017Date of Institution:03.01.2017Date of Decision:18.07.2017Sudhir Bansal S/o Bhajan Lal Bansal, R/o H.No.1592, Sector -13, Hisar, Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Priv...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.