Court Name: Jehanabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Both parties absent. Complainant has not complied the order dated 06.12.2023 regarding filing of requisites of notices to be sent to the OP. From the perusal of the record it appears that the complainant is regularly absent since after filing of the complainant on 01.12.2023. Hen...
Case Number: 71
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2023
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2024
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHMisc. Application No.(CC No.507 of 2022):13 of 2023Date of filing M.A. :08.02.2023Date of Order.:08.02.20241] Subhash Chander Sagar son of Late Sh.Bal Krishan,2] Versha Sagar wife of Sh.Subhash Chander Sagar,Both r...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2023
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2024
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1462 OF 20171. MOHINDER SINGH PANESAR & ANR.S/O. LT. SANT SINGH, R/O. 121 LANGLEY ROAD, SLOUGH SL3, 7DZ BERKSHIRE,U.K.2. MRS. SURJEET KAUR PANESAR,S/O. MOHINDER SINGH PANESAR, R/O. 121 LANGLEY ROAD, SLOUGH...
Case Number: 1462
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2024
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 29/11/2021 in Complaint No. 123/2016 of the State Commission Kerala)1. DLF SOUTHEM TOWNS PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS.1-E, JHANDEWALAN EXTN. NAAZ CINEMA COMPLEX, NEW DELHI-110055, R...
Case Number: 389
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2023
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2023
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DEEPAK JAGLAN
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Miscellaneous Application No. MA/444/2023( Date of Filing : 19 Dec 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/805/20171. MUKESH KHERMUKESH KHER ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT.LTD.DLF HOMES PANCHKULA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: NARESH KATYAL PRESIDI...
Case Number: 444
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2023
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2023
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NAVEEN SHEOKAND
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/805/2017( Date of Filing : 13 Dec 2017 )1. MUKESH KHER#100, STREET NO. A, NEAR KAMAL CINEMA SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE NEW DELHI. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT.LTD.SCO 190/191/192, SECTOR 8-C, CHANDIGARH. ............Opp.P...
Case Number: 805
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2023
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RANJAN LOHAN
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/166/2017( Date of Filing : 20 Mar 2017 )1. RITA SEHRAWATW/O SHAMSHER SINGH SEHRAWAT H.N.294, SECTOR 7A CHANDIGARH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT.LTD.SCO 190-192, SECTOR8C CHANDIGARH............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: NA...
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2023
Court Name: Bargarh
Appelant Advocate SRI D. DASH WITH ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2023
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2023
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ABHISHEK BHATEJA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 46 OF 20181. ROHIT THAKUR & ANR.SON OF MR. K.S. THAKUR RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 1368-B, SECTOR 31-B CHANDIGARHPUNJAB ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECT...
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2023
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate Narinder Sharma
Respondant Advocate Tanika Goyal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.Complaint case no.:RBT/CC/234/2023Date of Institution:14.09.2020/ 08.06.2023Date of decision:10.11.2023Anil Kumar Gupta @ Anil Gupta son of Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta, R/o H.No.1667, Sector-21, Panchkula, PIN-134116 (Har...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2023
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.