Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, faced with a situation that in this Execution Application, violation of order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi has been alleged, Counsel for the Decree Holders wishes to withdraw this Execution Ap...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
ORDER It is stated at bar by Sh. Hoshiar Chand, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is further stated that in view of said settlement, he wishes to withdraw this complaint. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies ...
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:136 of 2017Date of Institution:14.02.2017Date of Decision:14.08.2017Mrs. Divyajot Kaur wife of Sh. Sumit Sagar Dogra,Mr. Manmohan Singh Bagga son of Sh. Harbans Singh,Present Correspondence Address: H...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:14 of 2017Date of Institution:06.01.2017Date of Decision:14.08.2017Gulab Singh S/o Sh. Didar Singh R/o House No.62, Ward No.10, Sir Chottu Ram Colony, Karnal, Narwana, Distt. Jind, Haryana. ............
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:92 of 2017Date of Institution:30.01.2017Date of Decision:14.08.2017Jai Lall Bragta son of Late Sh. Budhi Singh Bragta, Resident of Vikram Cottage, Lakshmi Narayana Mandir Area, Shimla – 171006, ...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. N.P. SINGH & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 310 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/12/2016 in Complaint No. 127/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. MRIDUL ESTATE PVT. LTD.H-108, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI-110001...........Appellant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2017
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI),‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,NEW DELHI-110001Case No.C.C./674/1998 Dated:In the matter of:Surinder Gulati,House No. 760, Sector-15,faridabad ……..COMPLAINANTVERSUSM/s D.L.F. Univer...
Case Number: 674
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-1998
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY GUPTA & MR. AMIT MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 781 OF 20161. PARVEEN KUMAR GUPTA119, A.G.C.R. ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI-110092...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF UTILITIES LTD.(THROUGH ITS MD) DLF CENTRE, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110001...........Opp.Party(s)...
Case Number: 781
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BHARAT SOOD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 868 OF 20171. SATINDER PAL SINGHPO BOX-50248, DUBAI, UAE............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. DLF INDIA LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 1-B, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION, NAAZ CINEMA COMPLEX.NEW DELHI-110055...
Case Number: 868
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:129 of 2017Date of Institution:13.02.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Col. Harmohinder Singh S/o Sh. Balvinder Singh R/o 65 A/L, Model Town, Yamuna Nagar. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkul...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.