Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:203 of 2017Date of Institution:08.03.2017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Saroj Rani w/o Sh. Udey Bhan r/o H.No.133, Marketing Board Colony, Sector-14, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panc...
Case Number: 203
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:204 of 2017Date of Institution:08.03.2017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Rekha Sihag wife of Rajvir Singh Sihag, resident of GHS-27, Flat No.106, Sector-5, MDC, Panchkula.Neelam Gill daughter of Shri Shams...
Case Number: 204
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A K Sinha, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:348 of 2017Date of Institution:21.04.2017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Col. Dinesh Syal S/o Late Maj. Jiwan Lal Syal,Savita Sayal W/o Col. Dinesh Syal,Residents of H.No.951, Sector-7, Panchkula (Haryana)...
Case Number: 348
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:359 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.2017Date of Decision:29.08.20171. Arun Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Om Parkash Gupta,2. Monika W/o Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta,Both R/o 1 Drive, 72 Woodlands, #12-02 Woodsuale, 73...
Case Number: 359
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:360 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.2017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Lt. Col. Narender Patiyal S/o Sh. Birsingh Anantram Patiyal, OC IRW 21 CZW C/o 56 APO – 906115, Punjab. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:361 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Brig. Kuljeet Jawanda S/o Sh. Gurdev Singh Jawanda R/o H.No.627, Sector-33B, Chandigarh – 134107. .........Complainant.Versus1...
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:362 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.2017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Col. Vivan Sharma S/o Sh. Yag Dutt Sharma R/o House No.11, Society No.38, Sector 20, Panchkula. .........Complainant. Versus1. DLF ...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:363 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.2017Date of Decision:29.08.20171. Rana Ranveer S/o Sh. Ram Gopal Singh,2. Shweta Singh W/o Rana Ranveer through Rana Ranveer (GPA)Both R/o Sadhugachi, Akhara Ghat,...
Case Number: 363
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:789 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:29.08.2017Kamlesh Rani W/o Anand Kumar, Flat No.211, GHS-27, Mansa Devi complex, Sector 5, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Complainant. VersusD...
Case Number: 789
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:956 of 2016Date of Institution:21.12.2016Date of Decision:29.08.2017Pardeep Kumar son of Sh. Inder Singh permanent resident of #1487, Ward No.16, Street No.7, Rishi Nagar, Kaithal (Haryana).Monika San...
Case Number: 956
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.