Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suraj Bhan Hooda, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:288 of 2017Date of Institution:5.4.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Savita Dhillon aged 46 years, W/o Sh. Dilbag Singh, R/o H.No.266, Sector 7A, Chandigarh .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchku...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suraj Bhan Hooda, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:289 of 2016Date of Institution:5.4.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Kulwinder Pal Kaur, aged 44 years, W/o Sh. Surinder Singh, R/o H.No.1111, Sector 20-B, Chandigarh .........Complainant. VersusDLF Hom...
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:293 of 2017Date of Institution:5.4.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Col.Ravinder Singh, Son of Lt. Gurnam Singh (Retd.), R/o #1, Gujarat Artillery Battery NCC, NCC Group HQ, Law Garden, Ahmedabad 380 00...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:326 of 2017Date of Institution:18.4.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Sohan Lal Gupta S/o Late Sh. Geeta Ram, R/o H.No.218, Sector-10, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt...
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:327 of 2017Date of Institution:18.4.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Brig. Raj Kumar Bhatt S/o R.G.S. Bhatt,Renu Bhatt W/o Brig. Raj Kumar BhattBoth C/o HQ Eastern Command, Artillery Branch, Fort Willia...
Case Number: 327
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:328 of 2017Date of Institution:18.4.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Col. Digvijay Singh Basera S/o Late Sh. Hari Singh Basera, R/o 2 A R, Pin No.932002, C/o 99 APO. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Hom...
Case Number: 328
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:383 of 2017Date of Institution:4.5.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Brig.N.S. Thakur S/o Sh. Hari Singh R/o House No.15, Hira Nagar, Hamirpur (HP).Col.Upasana thakur W/o Brig. N.S. Thakur R/o House No.1...
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand Adv. & Kriteka Sheokand Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The parties have amicably settled the matter. In this view of the matter the counsel for the complainant wants to withdraw the complaint. In this regard he has appended a note on the complaint itself. In view of the aforesaid statement, this complaint is dismissed as withdra...
Case Number: 407
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2017
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate M V PATEL
Respondant Advocate K R SAKSENA
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:165 of 2017Date of Institution:20.02.2017Date of Decision:29.08.2017Satyendra Kumar Thakur S/o USP Thakur R/o D-201, Park Turquoise, Park Street Society (Near Wisdom World School), Khalewadi Phatta, W...
Case Number: 165
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.