Dlf
Latest Judgments
Total 1989 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf.
DLF Home Developers Ltd V/S Pradiptha Kumar Sahoo & Anr
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/195/2017 Dated:In the matter of: Shri Pradiptha Kumar SahooS/o Late Shri Nabaghana SahooR/o A-10/3,Welcomgroup CGHS,Plot No 6, Sector ...
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2017
DLF PRAMERICA LIFE INS CO LTD V/S NILAMVATI A KORI
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate P V PATEL
Respondant Advocate A P MEHTA
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2017
DLF LTD. V/S SH. SUMMET MANGLA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BANMALI SHUKLA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE DELHI STATECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments 22.09.2017Date of Decision :09.10.2017 CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.1487/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Shri Sumeet Mangla,R/o. 50, Deepali Ground Fl...
Case Number: 1487
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2017
M/S. DLF Ltd. V/S Sudha Gupta
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC./54/2014 Dated:In the matter of: MS. SUDHA RANI GUPTA,D/o Late Sh. Ram Nath Gupta,R/o 808, Katra Hindu Farash Khana,Delhi &helli...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2017
DLF Pramerica Life Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Jagsir Singh
Dlf Pramerica Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Surinder Garg
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 271
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2017
DLF Universal Ltd. V/S Manoj Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Malik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one under Section 25 or 27 as the case may be, after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is ...
Case Number: 333
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
DLF Homes PKL Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rishipal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Malik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one under Section 25 or 27 as the case may be, after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is ...
Case Number: 334
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vipan Kumar Bhalla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:220 of 2017Date of Institution:16.3.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Vipan Kumar Bhalla S/o Sh. Prem Kishan Bhalla.Amit Bhalla W/o Sh. Vipan Kumar Bhalla.Both R/o Flat No.14, GH 39, Mansa Devi Complex, ...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Om Parkash
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Kumar Rapria
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:261 of 2017Date of Institution:28.3.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Om Parkash son of Sh. Kanhaiya Lal, resident of 2122, Urban Estate, Jind (Haryana).Sumitra Devi W/o Om Parkash resident of 2122, Urba...
Case Number: 261
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ram Kishan Fauji
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Polly Shera
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:263 of 2017Date of Institution:28.3.2017Date of Decision:11.09.2017Ram Kishan Fauji Son of Dharampal, Resident of House No.2160, Gulshan Nagar, Tosham (Haryana) .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes ...
Case Number: 263
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.