Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.K.SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.430 of 2016 Date of Institution: 20.12.2016 Date of Decision: 26.10.2017Dr.(Mrs.) Raj Mittal Professor Physics Department, Punjabi University Patiala-147002 (Resident of Kothi No.4302 Phase-II, Urban...
Case Number: 430
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:338 of 2017Date of Institution:19.04.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Varinder Singh Saini (in fact Virander Singh Saini),Sidharth Saini S/o Sh. Varinder Singh Saini (in fact Virander Singh Saini),Rishi...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:339 of 2017Date of Institution:19.4.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Maj. Saurabh Chauhan S/o Sh. Digvir Singh Chauhan, 3/5 GR (FF), C/o 56 APO. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:384 of 2017Date of Institution:5.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Sandeep Kalia S/o Late Sh. Ram Sarup Kalia.Arti Kalia W/o Sh. Lalit Mohan Kalia.Both residents of House No.704, Sector-20A, Chandigarh...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla,Adv
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:399 of 2017Date of Institution:11.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Yogesh son of Sh. Daya Kishan,Rabita Kumari wife of Yogesh, Residents of H.No.242, Kharkhari Road, Ward No.1, Bhiwani. .........Comp...
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla,Adv
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:400 of 2017Date of Institution:11.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Vikas Yadav son of Sh. Ram Chander,Raghbir Singh son of Sh. Tara Singh, Both resident of H.No.1063, Sector-12-A, Panchkula. ...........
Case Number: 400
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla,Adv
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:401 of 2017Date of Institution:11.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Bhupinder Singh son of Sh. Tara Singh, Resident of village Nangal Sodhian, District Mahendergarh, Now residing Himshikha Colony, Pinj...
Case Number: 401
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla,Adv
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:402 of 2017Date of Institution:11.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Gitanjali wife of Sh. Pardip Singh, Resident of Flat No.302, Varbina Block, Amrawati Enclave, Panchkula. .........Complainant. Versu...
Case Number: 402
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla,Adv
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:403 of 2017Date of Institution:11.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Bhupinder Singh son of Sh. Tara Singh, Resident of village Nangal Sodhian, District Mahendergarh, Now residing Himshikha Colony, Pinj...
Case Number: 403
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:410 of 2017Date of Institution:12.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Asha Gupta W/o Dr. Bal Krishan Gupta, R/o B.K. Gupta Hospital, Rishi Nagar, Hissar 125001. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Home...
Case Number: 410
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.