Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Raj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Counsel for the complainant states that let this complaint, which is listed for 01.12.2017 be ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn and liberty be granted to the complainant to file it again after giving better particulars. On request made by Counsel for the complainant, the...
Case Number: 769
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1401 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2016 in Complaint No. 46/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS MANAGER/AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/OFFICER-IN-CHARGE/DIRE...
Case Number: 1401
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kabir Sarin, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:376 of 2017Date of Institution:02.05.2017Date of Decision:13 Nov. 2017Sh.Narinder Kumar son of Sh.Kanshi Ram, r/o Parsons Overseas Ltd., 2nd Floor, B-2 Wing, Gulf Tower Dubai, PO Box 9123, UAE.Smt.Apo...
Case Number: 376
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tajeshwar Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:137 of 2017Date of Institution:14.02.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Sharan Pal Kaur w/o Sh. Ravinder Singh r/o House No.3278, Sector 27-D, Chandigarh.Ravinder Singh s/o Late Sh. Joginder Singh r/o Hou...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:212 of 2017Date of Institution:15.03.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Col. S. S. Chandel S/o Late Sh. Babu Ram Chandel, resident of Flat No.A-14, Florentine Housing Society, Sopan Baug, Ghorpadi, Pune &...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:221 of 2017Date of Institution:16.03.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Ramphal S/o Late Sh. Kali Ram, R/o H.No.99A, Maden pur, Sector-26, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Homes Panchkula P...
Case Number: 221
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satyaveer Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:270 of 2017Date of Institution:30.03.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Mr. Bhwani Shankar Sharma (in fact Bhawani Shankar Sharma), House No.697, First Floor, Sector 43, Chandigarh.Mr. Rakesh Sharma R/o H...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bhupender Ghanghas, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:276 of 2017Date of Institution:31.03.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Bhaskar Gautam S/o Sh. Brijesh Kumar Tyagi, resident of F-48/2, Meenakshi Puram, Behind Defence Colony, Mawana Road, Meerut (Uttar P...
Case Number: 276
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:329 of 2017Date of Institution:18.04.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Satparwirtak Singh Ghuman S/o Sh. Gurwak Singh Ghuman,Mini Randhawa, S/o Satparwirtak S. Ghuman,Both R/o 705 Vista Ridge, Dr. N. E. ...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhankar Baweja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:393 of 2017Date of Institution:09.05.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Kanta Sheoran wife of Sh. Rajesh Sheoran Resident of VPO Khullar, Tehsil Abohar, District Fazilka – 110070, Punjab. ............
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.