Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1734 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 27/10/2016 in Complaint No. 436/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appel...
Case Number: 1734
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJOY KUMAR GHOSH & MS. RUPALI GHOSH
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 439 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/06/2014 in Complaint No. 157/2014 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. Y.V. SECURITIES & DERIVATIVES PVT. LTD. & ANR.HAVING ITS REGRD. OFFICE AT: D-97, BANGUR AVENUE...
Case Number: 439
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:315 of 2017Date of Institution:11.04.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Virender Singh son of Sh. Partap Singh, Resident of Flat No.298, Salaria Office Enclave, Sector 21, New Delhi. .........Complainant...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P Dangi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:358 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Manju W/o Sh. Harpal Singh, Resident of Flat No.44, Sidharth Appartment, Inder Enclave, Paschim Vihar – 110087, New Delhi. .....
Case Number: 358
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Randhir Singh Redhu, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:377 of 2017Date of Institution:02.05.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Prithvi Singh Lohan resident of House No.60 GH 80, Sector 20, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Complainant. Versus1. DLF Homes Panchku...
Case Number: 377
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:380 of 2017Date of Institution:03.05.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Sh.Amarjit Singh Dullet s/o Sh. Sarjit Singh Dullet, r/o House No.89, Rose Avenue, Patiala.…… ComplainantV e r s u sDL...
Case Number: 380
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:535 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Poonam Rathee W/o Prof. Bhagat Singh R/o University Flat No.204, M. D. University Campus, Rohtak, Haryana – 124001. ............
Case Number: 535
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:537 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Kususm Lata (in fact Kusum Lata) W/o Sh. Mohan Lal, R/o H.No.544, Sector 4, panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchk...
Case Number: 537
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R P Dangi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:545 of 2017Date of Institution:17.07.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Naveen Dutt son of Sh. S. K. Sharma, Resident of H.No.1868, Faridabad 121006, Delhi, India. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes P...
Case Number: 545
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kashika Kaur Juneja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the appropriate Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties...
Case Number: 604
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.