Dlf
Latest Judgments
Total 1989 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf.
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., V/S Mrs. Ajita Kang
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the parties that the matter stands settled between the parties. As on today, the complainants have no grievance left against the Opposite Parties. In view of above, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint. Ordered accordingly. Ce...
Case Number: 679
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajesh Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gopal Sharma,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:589 of 2017Date of Institution:04.08.2017Date of Decision:08.02.2018Sh. Rajesh Sharma son of Late Sh. Judge Pal Sharma resident of Flat No.501-A, GH-105, Sector 20, Panchkula. .........Complainant. V...
Case Number: 589
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Lt. Gen. Depinder Singh Ahuja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vertika H Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:636 of 2017Date of Institution:22.08.2017Date of Decision:08.02.2018Lt. Gen. Depinder Singh Ahuja S/o Sh. Gurdev Singh Ahuja, resident of HQ 101 Area C/o. 99 APO through his Power of Attorney Holder S...
Case Number: 636
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Rajesh Kumar Tewatia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:645 of 2017Date of Institution:28.08.2017Date of Decision:08.02.2018Rajesh Kumar Tewatia (52 years) son of Harish Chander resident of House No.902, Urban Estate Sector 9, Karnal, (Haryana). ............
Case Number: 645
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited V/S Col Daljit Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Proxy Counsel for the decree holder states that the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties have satisfied the judgment under execution by making the requisite payment. In view of above, this execution application has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly. Certified copies of ...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
DLF SOUTHERN TOWNS PRIVATE LIMITED V/S Mr.JOSEPH NINAN
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate BLAZE K JOSE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/14/6981. Mr.JOSEPH NINANS/o.T.G.NINAN, M/s. PRINT EXPRESS , 44/1469A, ASOKA ROAD, KALOOR, COCHIN-682017...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF SOUTHERN TOWNS PRIVATE LIMITED1-E, JHANDEWALAN EXTN, NAAZ CINEMA...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2018
DLF Paramerica Life Insurance Company Limited V/S Surjit Singh
Court Name: Firozpur
Appelant Advocate M.L Chugh
Respondant Advocate Ashok Gupta
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2018
DLF Universal Pvt. Ltd. V/S Naresh Kaushal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 892
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2018
M/s DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Parminder Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Previous cost of Rs.1,500/- paid by the Counsel for the judgment debtors to the decree holder. Cost of Rs.1,500/- has also been deposited today in the Consumer Legal Aid Account vide receipt dated 22.01.2018 placed on record. At the time of arguments, it is agreed between t...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2018
DLF Homes V/S Anita Kapur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Service is complete. Sh. Arjun Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the judgment debtors by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. He states that to execute the conveyance deed, stamp duty comes to Rs.1,67,300/- approximately. On making the said p...
Case Number: 450
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.