Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:739 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Col. Birender Singh S/o Sh. R. K. Yadav presently residing at House No.545, Sector – 6, Panchkula, Haryana.Mrs. Seema Yadav d/...
Case Number: 739
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:740 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Air Commodore Mohinder Pal Singh Gill, S/o Late M.S. Gill, R/o GH 18A, Celebrity Homes, Palam Vihar, H-Block, Gurgaon – 122017...
Case Number: 740
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:741 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Col Avinash Sharma S/o Lt. Col. Rudra Kumar Sharma R/o P-14, DKS Colony, Near Sadul Club, Bikaner Cantt. Rajasthan.Ms. Sonia Sharma,...
Case Number: 741
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:742 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Col. Maninder Singh Chahal, S/o Shri Joginder Singh Chahal, R/o House No.577, Phase – 3A, Mohali, Punjab. .........Complainan...
Case Number: 742
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:743 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Lt. Gen. Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Girdhari Lal Pandit R/o House No.568 P, Sector 21, Panchkula 134116Mr. Rohit Pandit S/o Lt. Gen. Nare...
Case Number: 743
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:744 of 2016Date of Institution:26.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Maj Gen PN Verma S/o Devi Ram Verma, R/o House No.-1 (MES IB), Panagarh Army Base, Distt – Burdwan, Westa Bengal, Pin – ...
Case Number: 744
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:745 of 2016Date of Institution:27.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Kamlesh Sindhu W/o Late Sh. Kulwant Singh, R/o H.No.2 on Khuda Alisher Road Near Kansal Enclave, Part B, U.T., Chandigarh. ...........
Case Number: 745
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:746 of 2016Date of Institution:27.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Kamlesh Sindhu W/o Late Sh. Kulwant Singh, R/o H.No.2 on Khuda Alisher Road Near Kansal Enclave, Part B, U.T., Chandigarh. ...........
Case Number: 746
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:747 of 2016Date of Institution:27.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Kamlesh Sindhu W/o Late Sh. Kulwant Singh, R/o H.No.2 on Khuda Alisher Road Near Kansal Enclave, Part B, U.T., Chandigarh. ...........
Case Number: 747
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:750 of 2016Date of Institution:27.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Deva Singh son of Ram Kishan R/o House No.1075, Sector-20-B, Chandigarh. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.,...
Case Number: 750
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.