Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Ms. Sapna Seth, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the Opposite Parties, which is taken on record. She seeks time to file reply and evidence on behalf of the Opposite Parties. At this stage, Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants states that on accoun...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ranjan Lohan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vide order dated 24.11.2016, compliant pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula was withdrawn with liberty to file it before the appropriate authority/court. Instead of filing that complaint before Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissi...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasbir Singh Punia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the competent Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charg...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kasturi Lal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:509 of 2016Date of Institution:24.08.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Anita Sood, aged about – years wife of Sh. Pankaj Sood, resident of House No.864, Sector 9, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Com...
Case Number: 509
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:615 of 2016Date of Institution:21.09.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Col. Amit Mishra, MA Branch (MS-17), Room No.531, A Wing, Sena Bhawan IHQ OF MOD (Army), New Delhi – 110105. .........Complai...
Case Number: 615
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:669 of 2016Date of Institution:04.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Air Vice Marshal Gurcharan Singh Bhogal S/o Sardar Harbans Singh R/o A/18, Spangle Heights, Dhakoli, Zirakpur Distt. Mohali - 160104...
Case Number: 669
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:756 of 2016Date of Institution:03.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Dev Raj Prashar s/o Sh. Jot Ram Prashar R/o #5637, Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra, Chandigarh.Vivek Prashar s/o Dev Raj Prashar R...
Case Number: 756
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:764 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Reena Rathee W/o Sh. Surender Singh R/o Flat No.40 C, Army Flats, Sector-4, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. .........Complainant. Ve...
Case Number: 764
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:765 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Vikrant Sharma S/o Sh. Shiv Darshan Sharma R/o C/o Gurmeet Singh, House No.3124, Sector 71, Mohali. .........Complainant. VersusDLF...
Case Number: 765
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:766 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Bimla Devi W/o Sh. Ramesh Kumar, H.No.948, Sector-2, Rohtak. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO 190-191...
Case Number: 766
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.