Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:24 of 2017Date of Institution:11.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Monika Goyal W/o Sh. Vineet Goyal,Vineet Goyal S/o Sh. Prem Sukh Goyal,Both R/o M/s Prem Sons, Main Bazaar, Solan, Distt. Solan. .........Complainants.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula ...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:25 of 2017Date of Institution:11.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Col. B. S. Ahlawat S/o Badlu Ram,Shakuntla Ahlawat W/o Col. B. S. Ahlawat,Both R/o A-28, Vijay Rattan Vihar, Sector-15, Part 2, Gurga...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:26 of 2017Date of Institution:11.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Sanjeev Goel S/o Late Sh. Amar Nath Goel, R/o H.No.1665, Sector 15, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:27 of 2017Date of Institution:11.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Parveen Deswal S/o Sh. Shiv Swaroop Yadav, HQ SPIC DRDO, Rao Tularam Marg Development Enclave, Delhi Cantt. Delhi – 110010. .....
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:28 of 2017Date of Institution:11.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Chand Ram S/o Sh. Jai Lal, H.No.193, Sector-2, Rohtak. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. SCO 190-191-192, Se...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:47 of 2017Date of Institution:17.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Arjun Bragta, son of Late Sh. Partap Singh Bragta, resident of Village Ghalera, PO Chalnair, Tehsil Kotkhai, Distt. Shimla, Himachal ...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Karan Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:831 of 2016Date of Institution:21.11.2016Date of Decision:05.05.2017Raman Kumar Saharan S/o Ranjit Singh Saharan R/o C/o Dr. Baljit Singh, House No.2019, Sector 27-C, Chandigarh.Mrs. Anamika Saharan W...
Case Number: 831
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:93 of 2017Date of Institution:30.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017P. K. Jindal son of Sh. P. D. Jindal, resident of Sh. P. D. Jindal,Neelam Jindal wife of Sh. P. K. Jindal,Both resident of House No.B...
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 2/5/2017ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spa...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 2/5/2017ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spa...
Case Number: 181
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.