Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 5/7/2017ORDER It is stated by Counsel for the complainant that amicable settlement of dispute is virtually at the final stage and let this complaint be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file it again, if settlement fails. Liberty granted. In view of above, this comp...
Case Number: 803
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SHEENU SURA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.120 of 2016 Date of Institution: 11.05.2016 Date of Decision: 05.07.2017Mrs. Neelima Singh W/o Mr. Maninder Singh R/o L-173, Army Flats, Sector-4, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula.…..ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 13/06/2017ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars before the competent Forum/Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as w...
Case Number: 417
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 25/05/2017ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this application with liberty to file it before the proper Forum/Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the...
Case Number: 409
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Complainant in person
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, the complainant wishes to withdraw this compliant. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 423
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Complainant in person
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, the Decree Holder/complainant, in view of pendency of First Appeal No.1312 of 2016 before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, wishes to withdraw this Execution Application at this stage, with liberty to fil...
Case Number: 197
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:100 of 2017Date of Institution:01.02.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Sidharth Jhinjha son of Vijay Singh R/o House No.22, Amravati Enclave, P.O. Surajpur, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana. .........Complaina...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:101 of 2017Date of Institution:01.02.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Vijay Laxmi Bhadoo W/o Late Mr. Bhoj Raj Bhadoo, resident of VPO Waryam Khera, The. Abohar, Distt. Feropzpur. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:32 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Kavita Devi wife of Amar Nath R/o House No.73, Nyaypuri, Karnal – 132001. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Homes Panchkula ...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:33 of 2017Date of Institution:12.01.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2017Promila Dhindsa wife of Abhishek Dhindsa, resident of House No.1402, Sector 1, HUDA, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra.Abhishek Dhindsa ...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.