Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:223 of 2017Date of Institution:16.03.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Col. Rajesh Kumar Jindal S/o Sh. Om Parkash Jindal, R/o H.No.3835/1, Sector 47-D, Chandigarh – 160047. .........Complainant. ...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:224 of 2017Date of Institution:16.03.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Col. Jaideep Bali S/o Lt. Col. Kuldeep Chander Bali,Pratibha Bali W/o Col. Jaideep Bali,Both R/o H.No.5180, Urban Estate, Phase-2, P...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:238 of 2017Date of Institution:21.03.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Amit Kumar Gupta son of Amrit Lal Gupta, 3056, Gupta Nursing Home, 2-A, Power House Road, Bathinda, District Bathinda. .........Com...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunil K Dixit, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
ORDER Counsel for the Opposite Party states that qua part of the relief claimed, the complainants had earlier gone to District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Forum, Panchkula. Copy of judgment dated 29.09.2016 passed by the said Forum in Consumer Complaint No.283 of 201...
Case Number: 467
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:56 of 2017Date of Institution:18.01.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Brig. Ranjit Singh, 34, Maitri Apartments, A/3, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, India. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pri...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:88 of 2017Date of Institution:27.01.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Lt. Col. Narender Singh S/o Sh. Sukhbir Singh R/o 795, ASC BN (AM), N Area, Near Airport, Chandigarh. .........Complainant. VersusDL...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated by Counsel for the decree holder that in view of stay granted by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi vide order dated 26.04.2017 in First Appeal No.638 of 2017, at this stage, this execution application be dismissed as wi...
Case Number: 263
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:128 of 2017Date of Institution:13.2.2017Date of Decision:25.07.2017Col. S.S. Kingra S/o Sh. Pritam Singh,Jagwinder Kaur W/o Col. S.S. Kingra,Both R/o H.No.660, Amrawati Enclave, P.O. Chandimandir, Pan...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:13 of 2017Date of Institution:6.1.2017Date of Decision:25.07.2017Vinod Kumar Gaba S/o Sh. Jaswant Rai R/o flat No.404, GH-67, Sector-20, Panchkula .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt....
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:130 of 2017Date of Institution:13.2.2017Date of Decision:25.07.2017Naveen Kumar S/o Sh. Joginder Pal,Amit Garg S/o Sh. Jagdish Lal,Both R/o Aggarwal Comsec Pvt. Ltd., Near Aggarsain Chowk, Patiala roa...
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.