Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:789 of 2016Date of Institution:11.11.2016Date of Decision:29.08.2017Kamlesh Rani W/o Anand Kumar, Flat No.211, GHS-27, Mansa Devi complex, Sector 5, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Complainant. VersusD...
Case Number: 789
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
ORDER It is stated at bar by Sh. Hoshiar Chand, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is further stated that in view of said settlement, he wishes to withdraw this complaint. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies ...
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:136 of 2017Date of Institution:14.02.2017Date of Decision:14.08.2017Mrs. Divyajot Kaur wife of Sh. Sumit Sagar Dogra,Mr. Manmohan Singh Bagga son of Sh. Harbans Singh,Present Correspondence Address: H...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:14 of 2017Date of Institution:06.01.2017Date of Decision:14.08.2017Gulab Singh S/o Sh. Didar Singh R/o House No.62, Ward No.10, Sir Chottu Ram Colony, Karnal, Narwana, Distt. Jind, Haryana. ............
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:92 of 2017Date of Institution:30.01.2017Date of Decision:14.08.2017Jai Lall Bragta son of Late Sh. Budhi Singh Bragta, Resident of Vikram Cottage, Lakshmi Narayana Mandir Area, Shimla – 171006, ...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:129 of 2017Date of Institution:13.02.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Col. Harmohinder Singh S/o Sh. Balvinder Singh R/o 65 A/L, Model Town, Yamuna Nagar. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkul...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:174 of 2017Date of Institution:27.02.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Col. Rajendra Kumar Swain S/o Late Sh. Govind Swan, at present residing at P-72/C, Shankar Vihar, Delhi Cantt., Delhi – 110010...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:187 of 2017Date of Institution:02.03.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Radha Krishan S/o Gurdial Singh R/o House No.96, Amravati Enclave, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand Adv. & Kriteka Sheokand Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:188 of 2017Date of Institution:02.03.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Sudesh Goyal W/o Parmod Kumar Goyal, resident of House No.1722, Sector-7, Urban Estate, Karnal, Haryana. .........Complainant. Vers...
Case Number: 188
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:222 of 2017Date of Institution:16.03.2017Date of Decision:04.08.2017Bhagwant Singh S/o Sh. Shamsher Singh, H.No.BX-815, K.C. Road, Barnala, Punjab. .........Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt....
Case Number: 222
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.