Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhankar Baweja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:393 of 2017Date of Institution:09.05.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Kanta Sheoran wife of Sh. Rajesh Sheoran Resident of VPO Khullar, Tehsil Abohar, District Fazilka – 110070, Punjab. ............
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:536 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Col. Sandeep Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Balbir Prasad Jain,Ritu Jain W/o Col. Sandeep Kumar Jain,Both R/o #240/2, Vikram Nagar, Shankar Viha...
Case Number: 536
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:538 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Maj. Pardeep Vij S/o Sh. Kasturi Lal Vij,Janhvi Vij W/o Maj. Pardeep Vij,Both R/o 16 Panna Park Society, Near Vijay Cross Roads, Nav...
Case Number: 538
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:539 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Dr. Sunil Soni S/o Dr. S. K. Soni, R/o Dr. Ram Narain Soni Hospital, Sector -15, Kaimri Road, Hisar – Haryana. .........Compl...
Case Number: 539
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NP Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:577 of 2017Date of Institution:28.07.2017Date of Decision:07.11.2017Shri Neeraj Pal R/o House No.D-214, Vivek Vihar, Sector 82, Noida – 201301, Uttar Pradesh. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Ho...
Case Number: 577
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate TARUN GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAComplaint No : 396 of 2017Date of Institution: 23.06.2017Date of Decision : 30.10.20171. Surendra Pal Gupta son of Sh. Rattan Lal Gupta2. Madhu Gupta wife of Sh. Surendra Pal Gupta Both residents of Nal/Comet House P...
Case Number: 396
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.K.SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.430 of 2016 Date of Institution: 20.12.2016 Date of Decision: 26.10.2017Dr.(Mrs.) Raj Mittal Professor Physics Department, Punjabi University Patiala-147002 (Resident of Kothi No.4302 Phase-II, Urban...
Case Number: 430
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:338 of 2017Date of Institution:19.04.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Varinder Singh Saini (in fact Virander Singh Saini),Sidharth Saini S/o Sh. Varinder Singh Saini (in fact Virander Singh Saini),Rishi...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:339 of 2017Date of Institution:19.4.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Maj. Saurabh Chauhan S/o Sh. Digvir Singh Chauhan, 3/5 GR (FF), C/o 56 APO. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:384 of 2017Date of Institution:5.5.2017Date of Decision:24.10.2017Sandeep Kalia S/o Late Sh. Ram Sarup Kalia.Arti Kalia W/o Sh. Lalit Mohan Kalia.Both residents of House No.704, Sector-20A, Chandigarh...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.