Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:488 of 2017Date of Institution:15.06.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017Jagdeep Chauhan S/o Sh. N. S. Chauhan R/o WARCEN, HQ Western Command, Chandimandir Cantt., Panchkula, Haryana. .........Complainant...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla,Adv
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:495 of 2017Date of Institution:20.06.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017Prem Chand Aggarwal son of Sh. Moti Ram, Resident of H.No.407, Sector 17, Panchkula, District Panchkula.Poonam Gupta wife of Sh. Sus...
Case Number: 495
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting one photocopy of complete original fi...
Case Number: 534
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of order passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 24.11.2017 in I.A.No.18303 of 2017 in First Appeal No.1239 of 2017 alongwith connected appeals bearing Nos.1242, 1247, 1253 & 1317 of 2017, Counsel for the decree holders ...
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1060 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 12/04/2017 in Complaint No. 960/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH2. DLF HOMES PA...
Case Number: 1060
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1734 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 27/10/2016 in Complaint No. 436/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appel...
Case Number: 1734
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaajla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:315 of 2017Date of Institution:11.04.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Virender Singh son of Sh. Partap Singh, Resident of Flat No.298, Salaria Office Enclave, Sector 21, New Delhi. .........Complainant...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P Dangi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:358 of 2017Date of Institution:26.04.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Manju W/o Sh. Harpal Singh, Resident of Flat No.44, Sidharth Appartment, Inder Enclave, Paschim Vihar – 110087, New Delhi. .....
Case Number: 358
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Randhir Singh Redhu, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:377 of 2017Date of Institution:02.05.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Prithvi Singh Lohan resident of House No.60 GH 80, Sector 20, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Complainant. Versus1. DLF Homes Panchku...
Case Number: 377
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:535 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2017Poonam Rathee W/o Prof. Bhagat Singh R/o University Flat No.204, M. D. University Campus, Rohtak, Haryana – 124001. ............
Case Number: 535
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.