Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........
Case Number: 318
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDR YADAV, AMARJEET SINGH & ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........
Case Number: 319
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. ARJUN JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARJUN JAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........
Case Number: 644
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Virender Dhull, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:404 of 2017Date of Institution:11.05.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017Kaptan Singh Malik son of Sai Narayar Singh Malik resident of Uchana, Tehsil Narwana, District Jind, Haryana. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:437 of 2017Date of Institution:23.05.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017Seema Pura wife of Shri Anil Pura, resident of House No.551, Sector 4, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes P...
Case Number: 437
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:440 of 2017Date of Institution:24.05.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017R. K. Shandil S/o Late Sh. Vijai Kumar Shandil, R/o Shandil Cottage (Cosey Retreat) Rajgarh Road, Kotla-Nala, Solan (Himachal Prades...
Case Number: 440
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:443 of 2017Date of Institution:24.05.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017Jagvir Singh S/o Sh. Jile Singh, H.No.101, Ward No.04, Behind Jangra Market, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusDL...
Case Number: 443
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:453 of 2017Date of Institution:30.05.2017Date of Decision:01.12.2017Sunil Kohar wife of Shri Satyavir Singh Kohar, resident of Kothi No.9, Canal Colony, Hisar – 132001. .........Complainant. Ve...
Case Number: 453
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.