company-name-logo

Dlf Homes

Latest Judgments

Total 1231 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf Homes.

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Varsha Khangwal

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:626 of 2017Date of Institution:22.08.2017Date of Decision:13.12.2017Varsha Khangwal W/o Sh. Yogesh Kumar,Yogesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal,Both R/o H.No.656, Sector-6, Panchkula.…….Complain...

Case Number: 626

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Kamlesh Kumar (Since Deceased) through Legal Heirs Manju Sharma

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:627 of 2017Date of Institution:22.08.2017Date of Decision:13.12.2017Kamlesh Kumar (Since Deceased) through Legal Heirs.Manju Sharma (Wife)Mamta Sharma (Daughter)Tarun Sharma (Son)Pushkar Sharma (Son)P...

Case Number: 627

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Surender Nath Mehra

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

At the time of arguments, when we look into total price of the unit and the amount claimed in the prayer clause, the total amount would cross the limit of Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-f...

Case Number: 472

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2017

NCDRC

HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR. V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 123

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

NCDRC

SUNIL SANGA & ANR. V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 124

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

NCDRC

YOGESH SHARMA & ANR. V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 125

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

NCDRC

KUMAR PRABHAKAR & ANR. V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

NCDRC

SUMIT GUPTA V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 127

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

NCDRC

TARANA NEGI V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 128

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

NCDRC

PARMINDERJIT SINGH GILL V/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/12/2016 in Complaint No. 508/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMANSHU ARORA & ANR..........

Case Number: 129

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.