Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Proxy Counsel for the decree holder states that the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties have satisfied the judgment under execution by making the requisite payment. In view of above, this execution application has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly. Certified copies of ...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Previous cost of Rs.1,500/- paid by the Counsel for the judgment debtors to the decree holder. Cost of Rs.1,500/- has also been deposited today in the Consumer Legal Aid Account vide receipt dated 22.01.2018 placed on record. At the time of arguments, it is agreed between t...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Service is complete. Sh. Arjun Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the judgment debtors by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. He states that to execute the conveyance deed, stamp duty comes to Rs.1,67,300/- approximately. On making the said p...
Case Number: 450
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:457 of 2017Date of Institution:31.05.2017Date of Decision:22.12.2017Surinder Singh Mann S/o Late Sh. Gurmej Singh R/o H.No.5202/3, Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra.Agamjot Mann W/o Sh. Surinder Singh...
Case Number: 457
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2017
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate shubhankar baweja
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Complaint Case No.:144 of 2017Date of Institution:21.07.2017Date of Decision:21.12.2017Sandeep Singh S/o Late Sh.Jagir Singh, R/o H.No.1868/2, Housefeed Complex, Phase 10, SAS Nagar (Mohali) (pb). ….Compla...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage with liberty to file a-fresh one as and when need so arises. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare cop...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, when we look into total price of the unit and the amount claimed in the prayer clause, the total amount would cross the limit of Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fr...
Case Number: 562
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:623 of 2017Date of Institution:22.08.2017Date of Decision:13.12.2017Pooja Mittal W/o Sh. Sunandan Mittal, R/o B-IX-955, Ramganj Road, Street No.1, Moga, Punjab.…….Complainant.VersusDLF H...
Case Number: 623
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:624 of 2017Date of Institution:22.08.2017Date of Decision:13.12.2017Wg. Cdr. Man Mohan Joshi S/o Late Sh. M. L. Joshi R/o 329-A, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu.…….Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchk...
Case Number: 624
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:625 of 2017Date of Institution:22.08.2017Date of Decision:13.12.2017Krishana Kumar Saharan S/o Sh. Sheo Ram Sharan R/o Kulwant Baswana, C/o Lt. Col. K. K. Sharan, H.No.122/2, Bank Colony, Pipliwala To...
Case Number: 625
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.