Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After hearing Counsel for the complainants, we direct the Opposite Parties to treat this complaint as a representation and decide it by passing a speaking order. Contention of the complainants that Oriental Insurance Company Limited would fall within the definition of Government ...
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:213 of 2017Date of Institution:15.03.2017Date of Decision:08.03.2018Mr. Rajiv Tanwar S/o Late Sh. Raj Kumar, resident of House No.432, Sector-6, Panchkula. .........Complainant.V e r s u s1. DLF Hom...
Case Number: 213
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:214 of 2017Date of Institution:15.03.2017Date of Decision:08.03.2018Suresh Gaur S/o Sohan Lal, Resident of H.No.95/1, Prade Street Kalka, Distt. Panchkula. .........Complainant.V e r s u s1. DLF Home...
Case Number: 214
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Surjeet Bhadu, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the judgment debtors states that in terms of order dated 23.02.2018 passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in IA/3678/2018, the judgment debtors have deposited the requisite amount with the said Commission. In view of ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 23.03.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 325
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Judgment Debtor states that one defect remains to be rectified and the same shall be removed within 3 days from today. On his assurance, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage. Ordered accor...
Case Number: 449
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 31.03.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Decree Holder, who is present in Court, very graciously states that he is not insisting upon payment of Rs.2,000/- imposed as cost upon the non-applicants/judgment debtors vide order dated 09.11.2017. We appreciate the gesture shown. This application has been filed under Section ...
Case Number: 301
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Decree holder No.1, who is present in Court, very graciously states that he is not insisting upon payment of Rs.2,000/- imposed as cost upon the non-applicants/judgment debtors vide order dated 09.11.2017. We appreciate the gesture shown. Ordered accordingly. This application has...
Case Number: 302
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.