Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:42 of 2018Date of Institution:25.01.2018Date of Decision:17.05.20181. Navneet s/o Ram Niranjan,2. Anita Rani w/o Navneet,Both are resident of 1036, First Floor, Sector 35B, Chandigarh.……...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Chawla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant states that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. This fact has been affirmed by Sh.Parveen Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party. Prayer is to withdraw this complaint accordingly. In view of above, this complaint is dismis...
Case Number: 664
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Chawla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant states that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. This fact has been affirmed by Sh.Parveen Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party. Prayer is to withdraw this complaint accordingly. In view of above, this complaint is dismis...
Case Number: 662
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manish Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh.Tejinder Singh, Advocate that he is working in the office of Sh.Manish Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants. He further states that as per instructions given by the complainants, the matter stands settled and on account of that, he wishes to withdraw th...
Case Number: 290
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Dodan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Called third time at the end of the entire list. None came present today on behalf of the decree holders to prosecute this execution application. As such, this execution application is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty shall remain with the decree holders to fil...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J K Singla
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retai...
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhishek S Bhaskar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again, if need be, after giving better particulars/facts. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for th...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. MAHAJAN & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 712 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 03/03/2016 in Complaint No. 774/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, CHANDIGARH 2. DLF HOMES PAN...
Case Number: 712
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SURENDER PAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 94 of 2016 Date of Institution: 11.04.2016 Date of Decision: 24.04.2018Surender Sindhu son of Shri Kitab Singh, resident of House No.1173, Sector-11, Panchkula, Haryana.…..ComplainantVERSUS...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:802 of 2017Date of Institution:21.11.2017Date of Decision:23.04.2018Deepak Katoch S/o Late Sh. Prakash Chand Katoch,Prasanta Katoch W/o Sh. Deepak Katoch,Both R/o Sharanam-11 Apartments, Nearby SHALBY...
Case Number: 802
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.