Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MS. ASTHA TYAGI & MR. DINESH C. TREHAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1347 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/09/2016 in Complaint No. 274/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITED...........Appellant(s)Versus1. COL. B.N.L. KAUSHAL & ANR....
Case Number: 1347
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/10/2015 in Complaint No. 174/2015 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........Appellan...
Case Number: 1315
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/10/2015 in Complaint No. 174/2015 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........Appellan...
Case Number: 1158
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. SUMIT JIDANI & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/10/2015 in Complaint No. 174/2015 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........Appellan...
Case Number: 1147
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SATYENDER KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/10/2015 in Complaint No. 174/2015 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........Appellan...
Case Number: 1146
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SAVINDER SINGH GILL & MR. ANANT AGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/10/2015 in Complaint No. 174/2015 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........Appellan...
Case Number: 1145
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the judgment debtors that appeal bearing No.2144 of 2017 filed by the judgment debtors, against the order under execution is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, in which, stay has been granted in t...
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the judgment debtors that appeal bearing No.136 of 2017 filed by the judgment debtors, against the order under execution is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, in which, stay has been granted in th...
Case Number: 239
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vineet Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. There is no opposition to the prayer made. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. On submit...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.