Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 233
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Kohar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Di...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP MALIK
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.183 of 2017Date of the Institution:28.03.2017Date of Decision: 24.09.20181. Rajesh Kumar S/o Sh.Poker Mal R/o H.No.1345, Urban Estate Jind (Haryana).2. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Sh.Poker Mal R/o H.No.13...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D K Singal & Ammish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:150 of 2018Date of Institution:06.04.2018Date of Decision:10.09.2018Shri Bhagwan Kaushik S/o Sh. Bhim Sain Kaushik R/o House No.492, First Floor, Sector – 12, Panchkula. .........Complainant. V...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:23 of 2018Date of Institution:15.01.2018Date of Decision:10.09.2018Kanta Narang wife of Shri Roshan Lal Narang;Roshan Lal Narang son of Shri Mohan Lal Narang;Complainant Nos.1 and 2 both are residents...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1576 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/10/2016 in Complaint No. 291/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 1580
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1576 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/10/2016 in Complaint No. 291/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 1579
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH, MS. NEHA YADAV & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1576 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/10/2016 in Complaint No. 291/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 1577
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1576 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/10/2016 in Complaint No. 291/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 1589
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH, MS. NEHA YADAV & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1576 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/10/2016 in Complaint No. 291/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 1576
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.