Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHEOKAND & KRITEKA SHEOKAND & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2018 IN FA/1929/20171. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUDESH GOYAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'B...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 361 OF 2018 IN FA/1933/20171. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. AMIT KUMAR GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBERH...
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anamika Mehra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of settlement arrived at between the parties in terms of Settlement Deed dated 13.09.2018, placed on record, by moving Miscellaneous Application bearing No.575 of 2018, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint. Accordingly, as per prayer made, the co...
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anamika Mehra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant states that the parties have compromised the matter, on account of which, she wishes to withdraw this complaint. Accordingly, the complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 316
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Sachdeva Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
On 21.08.2018, following order was passed by this Commission:- “In Consumer Complaint bearing No.107 of 2016, following order was passed by this Commission on 12.07.2016 :- “At the time of arguments, matter has amicably been settled. On telephonic instructions from Sh...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhankar Baweja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is at bar by Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate for the opposite parties, on taking instructions from Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Company that settlement has been arrived at between the parties and copy of the same has been sent to the complainant. The complainant has shown ...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:784 of 2017Date of Institution:07.11.2017Date of Decision:28.09.20181. Brigadier Girish Gogia (Retd.) S/o Sh. Chuni Lal Gogia R/o A-405, Meghadri Heights, Yapral, JJ Nagar (Post), Secunderabad –...
Case Number: 784
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh. Rakesh Kerwell, Direc...
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 233
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.