Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed by the decree holders under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to execute an order dated 23.04.2018 passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.346 of 2017. Vide the aforesaid order, following relief was granted...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER In response to order dated 25.02.2019 passed by this Commission, Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has placed on record a demand draft bearing No.518914 dated 06.03.2019 in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- in the name of ‘Hari Ram Dangra and Arun Kumar&r...
Case Number: 294
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P. Dangi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed to execute order passed by this Commission on 16.03.2018 in Consumer Complaint No.665 of 2017 and subsequently, modified by Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi vide judgment dated 10.01.2019 passed in First Appe...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Puneet Tuli, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated by Counsel for the complainant and Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. In view of above, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint. Ordered accordingly. Certi...
Case Number: 465
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors filed, which is taken on record. It is on record that despite issuance of directions by the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi vide order dated 23.08.2017, the judgment debtors failed to make the ...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Radhika Subhash & Jasraj Singh Toor, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Parveen Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the opposite parties that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. To evidence above said fact, copy of Settlement Deed has been placed on record. In view of settlement arrived at between the parties, this c...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADITYA BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.63 of 2018Date of the Institution:09.02.2018Date of Decision: 13.02.2019Dr. R.S.Mehla s/o Sh. Late Shri Lajja Ram, R/o H.No. 870, Urban Estate Sector-13, Karnal, Haryana 132001. M No.+91896665870 .&helli...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
When confronted with the question that relief claimed by the complainant is more than Rs.1 crore and, as such, this Commission has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, Sh.Kunal Thapa, Advocate, proxy for Sh.Himanshu Raj, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant w...
Case Number: 818
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.427 of 2017Date of the Institution:10.07.2017Date of Decision: 24.01.2019Vijender Singh Malik s/o Sh. Shri Attar Singh Malik and Gautam Malik S/o Sh. Sh. Vijender Singh Malik, both residents of Flat No.C...
Case Number: 427
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Puneet Tuli, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Puneet Tuli, Advocate, Counsel for the appellant states that he would like to withdraw his Power of Attorney as the appellant/complainant is present in person. We permit Sh. Puneet Tuli, Advocate to withdraw his Power of Attorney. The appellant/complainant, namely, Smt. Jagpa...
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.