Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
On 06.02.2019, following order was passed by this Commission :- “To discharge their liability, the judgment debtors have handed over a demand draft bearing No.518310 dated 31.01.2019 for an amount of Rs.11,68,164/- in the name of the Secretary, State Consumer Disputes Redre...
Case Number: 247
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application has been filed by the decree holders to execute order dated 23.04.2018. Admittedly, against the said order, appeal bearing No.1080 of 2018 is pending and fixed for consideration before the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, N...
Case Number: 244
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P. Dangi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In terms of the order passed by this Commission on 27.03.2019, demand drafts bearing Nos.519013 & 519014, both dated 16.03.2019 in the sum of Rs.7,28,156/- & Rs.2,71,844/-, which was placed on record yesterday by Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, hav...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J.K. Singla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the last date of hearing i.e. 21.02.2019, following order was passed by this Commission:- “Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors not filed. Be filed on the next date of hearing. As per office report, an amount of Rs.62,13,422/- through demand draft has been recei...
Case Number: 333
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Jain, Balram Prashar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the last date of hearing i.e. 07.02.2019, following order was passed by this Commission:-“After hearing the arguments and analyzing facts of the case, we direct the complainant to deposit an amount of Rs.15 Lakhs with the opposite party towards the balance amount claimed...
Case Number: 274
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:806 of 2017Date of Institution:21.11.2017Date of Decision:14.03.2019Rajeev Kumar Aggarwal S/o Sh. Subhash Chander Aggarwal R/o A.R. Empires Pvt. Ltd., SCO – 9, Universal Complex, Sector – ...
Case Number: 806
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:10 of 2018Date of Institution:09.01.2018Date of Decision:14.03.2019Pankaj Bhardwaj S/o Sh. Ram Avtar Sharma, R/o E 3/18 – Second Floor, DLF Valley Panchkula, Sector – 3, Pinjore – Ka...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:807 of 2017Date of Institution:21.11.2017Date of Decision:14.03.2019Parveen Kumar S/o Sh. Sukhdev Raj R/o A.R. Empires Pvt. Ltd., SCO – 9, Universal Complex, Sector – 1, Parwanoo, Distt &n...
Case Number: 807
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:805 of 2017Date of Institution:21.11.2017Date of Decision:14.03.20191. Madan Lal Kansal S/o Late Kaur Sain Kansal2. Amit Kansal S/o Sh. Madan Lal KansalBoth R/o C-109, Preet Vihar, Delhi – 11009...
Case Number: 805
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:25 of 2018Date of Institution:15.01.2018Date of Decision:14.03.20191. Narinder Jit Singh Gill S/o Mukhtiar Singh,2. Nirmal Deep Kaur Gill w/o Sh. Narinder jit Singh Gill,Both R/o #65, Defence Colony, ...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.