Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties.2. It is stated that let this matter be disposed of in terms of ratio of judgment in the case of DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D.S. Dhanda Etc., Civil Appeal Nos.4910-4941 of 2018 decided by H...
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed by the decree holders/complainants to execute order dated 13.10.2016 passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.337 of 2016 and also directions given by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New ...
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER The complainant started making payment whereof 16.02.2010 to purchase a flat from the opposite parties. Allotment letter was issued on 22.03.2010. Specific number of flat was allotted to the complainant. Thereafter, she continued to make payment from time to time as deman...
Case Number: 131
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/175/2019( Date of Filing : 17 May 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/391/20161. Parminder Kumarson of Shri Ranbir Singh, Resident of House No. 597-A, sector-6, HUDA, Panipat, Haryana...........Appell...
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:79 of 2019Date of Institution:09.04.2019Date of Decision:12.07.2019Sh. R. S. Malik resident of H.No.1064, First Floor, Sector 28-B, Chandigarh. .........Complainant.Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Priva...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vineet Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:257 of 2018Date of Institution:07.06.2018Date of Decision:11.07.2019Tarun Garg S/o Anil Kumar Garg R/o Kishore House, Assandh Road, Panipat, Haryana. .........Complainant.Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula...
Case Number: 257
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vineet Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:258 of 2018Date of Institution:07.06.2018Date of Decision:11.07.2019Swapandeep Mann S/o Sukhbir Singh Mann R/o House No.1269, Sector – 14, Faridabad, Haryana. .........Complainant.Versus1. DLF ...
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:313 of 2018Date of Institution:10.08.2018Date of Decision:11.07.20191. Col. Sanjay Garg S/o Sh. Bhagat Ram Garg,2. Shagun Garg W/o Lt. Col. Sanjay Garg,R/o C/o B. R. Garg, H.No.1763, Sector – 9,...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vineet Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:353 of 2018Date of Institution:17.09.2018Date of Decision:11.07.2019Rajdeep Mann S/o Sukhbir Singh Mann resident of House No.1269, Sector-4, Faridabad, Haryana. .........Complainant.Versus1. DLF Home...
Case Number: 353
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:307 of 2018Date of Institution:03.08.2018Date of Decision:11.07.2019Mrs. Indra Kumari wife of Ram Karan resident of House No.440, Bank Wali Gali, Saini Mohalla, Village Jonti, Delhi 81. .........Comp...
Case Number: 307
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.