Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. GAUTAM GODARA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1742 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/11/2016 in Complaint No. 375/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 191-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........App...
Case Number: 1745
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GORAV KATHURIA & GAUTAM GODARA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1742 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/11/2016 in Complaint No. 375/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 191-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........App...
Case Number: 2028
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GORAV KATHURIA & GAUTAM GODARA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1742 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/11/2016 in Complaint No. 375/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 191-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........App...
Case Number: 2027
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GORAV KATHURIA & GAUTAM GODARA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1742 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/11/2016 in Complaint No. 375/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 191-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH ...........App...
Case Number: 2023
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anamika Mehra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:255 of 2019Date of Institution:19.11.2019Date of Decision:22.11.2021Mr.Anil Mehta and Mrs. Sudha Mehta, R/o 12329-Funarocrest, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Amehta@theprecaster.com.VersusDLF Homes Panchk...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:69 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2021Sh. Arjun Singh Patial s/o Sh. Bishan Dass,Bishan Dass S/o Sh. Munshi Ram,Both residents of H.No.354-A, Sector 15, Panchkula.…...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:70 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2021Sh. Pramod Kumar Kashyup s/o Sh. Murli Dhar Kashyup,Abhishek Kashyup S/o Sh. Parmod Kumar Kashyup, Both residents of H.No.214, Sector...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:157 of 2016Date of Institution:22.04.2016Date of Decision:10.11.20211.Neera Agarwal W/o Sh. Amar Nath Agarwal,Ankur Agarwal S/o Sh. Amar Nath Agarwal,Both residents of 113, SFS Flats, Shakti Apartment...
Case Number: 157
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.S. Arya Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:54 of 2016Date of Institution:11.02.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2021HARI RAM DANGRA S/o Sh. Fateh SinghARUN KUMAR S/o Sh.Hari Ram DangraBoth Residents of House No-304, Group Housing Society -103,Sector...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:55 of 2016Date of Institution:11.02.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2021Lt. Col. D. P.S. Yadav S/o Sh. Risal Singh Yadav,Rachna Yadav W/o Lt. Col. D. P.S. Yadav,Both residents of House No.493, Sector 8, Pa...
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.