Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajan Lohan Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 04/08/2016ORDER Sh. Ranjan Lohan, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws the present complaint with liberty to file fresh complaint in the appropriate Forum / Court as per agreement. In view of the above, this ...
Case Number: 507
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.K.SINGAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Application No. 31 of 2016 in Complaint No. 147 of 2015 Date of the Institution: 26.08.2015 Date of Decision: 03.08.2016Vijay Kumar Thakur son of late Sh. Ganga Ram, resident of M/s Anurag Ent. Near Bus Stand, ...
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.137 of 2016Date of Institution11.04.2016Date of Decision02.08.2016Atul Gupta s/o Sh. Sohan Lal Gupta r/o #997, B-2, Ward No.9, Vishvkarma Colony, Pinjore, Distt. Panchkula, currently re...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.154 of 2016Date of Institution21.04.2016Date of Decision01.08.2016Pardeep s/o Sh. Roshan Lal r/o Near Paras Pradhan, Ward No.18, Charkhi Dadri, Bhiwani, Haryana. .…ComplainantVer...
Case Number: 154
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Arjun Grover, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.179 of 2016Date of Institution03.05.2016Date of Decision01.08.2016Shri Praveen Arora son of Sohan Lal Arora, R/o #1149, Sector 15, Panchkula. .…ComplainantVersusDLF Homes Panchku...
Case Number: 179
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:157 of 2016Date of Institution:22.04.2016Date of Decision:25.07.20161. Neera Agarwal W/o Sh. Amar Nath Agarwal,Ankur Agarwal S/o Sh. Amar Nath Agarwal,Both residents of 113, SFS Flats, Shakti Apartme...
Case Number: 157
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.S. Arya Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:54 of 2016Date of Institution:11.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016HARI RAM DANGRA S/o Sh. Fateh SinghARUN KUMAR S/o Sh.Hari Ram DangraBoth Residents of House No-304, Group Housing Society -103,Sector...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:55 of 2016Date of Institution:11.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Lt. Col. D. P.S. Yadav S/o Sh. Risal Singh Yadav,Rachna Yadav W/o Lt. Col. D. P.S. Yadav,Both residents of House No.493, Sector 8, P...
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:56 of 2016Date of Institution:11.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Sh. Pankaj Garg S/o Sh. Ramesh Garg, resident of SCF 42, Sector 8, Panchkula, Haryana.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkul...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:69 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Sh. Arjun Singh Patial s/o Sh. Bishan Dass,Bishan Dass S/o Sh. Munshi Ram,Both residents of H.No.354-A, Sector 15, Panchkula.&hellip...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.