Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:534 of 2016Date of Institution:31.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016N. R. Garg son of Mam Chand Garg resident of Flat No.11, GH-9, Sector-5, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. .........Complainant Versus...
Case Number: 534
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhishek Singh Adv. & Salil Sabhlok Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:566 of 2016Date of Institution:09.09.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Mahesh Tanwar S/o Major J. R. Tanwar, R/o House No.294, Amravati Enclave, P.O. Chandimandir, Panchkula.Charan Singh Tanwar S/o Major...
Case Number: 566
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:568 of 2016Date of Institution:12.09.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh. Roshan Lal Goyal son of Sh. Gopi Chand Goyal, aged 65 years,Mr. Puneet Goyal son of Sh. Roshan Lal Goyal, aged 34 years.Now resi...
Case Number: 568
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:283 of 2016Date of Institution:14.10.2016Date of Decision:29.11.2016Sandeep Singh S/o late Sh.Jagir Singh, R/o H.No.1868/2, Housefeed Complex, Phase-10, S.A.S.Nagar (Mohali) (Pb).….Comp...
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate RANJAN LOHAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:244 of 2016Date of Institution:08.09.2016Date of Decision:24.11.20161. Rajesh Kumar S/o Sh.Poker Mal, R/o H.No.1345, Urban Estate, Jind, Haryana.2. Dr.Sanjay Kumar, Professor, Department of LPM, C...
Case Number: 244
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Suraj Bhan Hooda, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ekta Jhanji,Adv
Dated :22/11/2016ORDER Today, an application for withdrawal of the complaint has been filed on behalf of the complainant. Sh. Surender Singh, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file afresh. In view...
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate ABHINEET TANEJA.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Complaint Case No.:88 of 2016Date of Institution:20.04.2016Date of Decision:21.11.2016Jagdish Rai Jindal S/o Sh.Bant Ram, R/o Flat No.22, Block-H, New Generation Apartments, Dhakoli. ….ComplainantVersus1....
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Krishan M. Vohra
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 970 OF 2016Seema Pura Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. and another BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Satyajeet Singh, Counsel for Co...
Case Number: 970
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Dhiman, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:356 of 2016Date of Institution:15.07.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2016Anil Kumar son of Sh. Raj Singh, resident of Village Kakana Bhadri, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat, Haryana. .........Complainant....
Case Number: 356
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Diwan Adlakha, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:374 of 2016Date of Institution:02.08.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2016Anupama W/o Sh. Ashwini Kumar D/o Surender Singh Narwal, Resident of House No.11, Minar Road, Karnal. .........Complainant VersusM/...
Case Number: 374
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.