Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P.Dangi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
During the pendency of the complaint, possession has been taken over by the complainant. It is stated by Counsel for the complainant that some issues need to be decided qua the amount claimed in excess when possession was offered and qua additional area also. He wishes to withdra...
Case Number: 550
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satyajeet Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/849/20161. Smt.Seema Purawife of Sh. Anil Pura, resident of House No. 551, Sector 4, Panchkula, Haryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.SCO 190-191-192, Sector 8C, Chandig...
Case Number: 849
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/438/20161. Chandbir SinghChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PAD...
Case Number: 438
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/503/20161. Kavita GoswamiChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PAD...
Case Number: 503
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/504/20161. KavitaChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY...
Case Number: 504
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/505/20161. Col. Amarjit Singh ChandhokeChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes PanchkulaChandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER...
Case Number: 505
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/506/20161. Anuj AroraChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA P...
Case Number: 506
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/507/20161. Col. Virender MohanChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBE...
Case Number: 507
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:508 of 2016Date of Institution:24.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Himanshu Arora S/o Sh. Arvind Kumar Arora,Arvind Kumar Arora S/o Radhey Lal Arora,Both R/o H.No.24, First Floor, Sector – 10, ...
Case Number: 508
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:515 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Col. Baldev Singh Katoch, S/o Sh. Piar Singh Katoch, r/o #22B/D, Green Belt Park, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu currently residing at J.P. Ass...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.