company-name-logo

Dlf Homes

Latest Judgments

Total 1231 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf Homes.

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited & Others V/S Mrs. Shelly Garg

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:573 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Mrs. Shelly Garg wife of Shri Ajay Garg, resident of House No.588, Sector 6, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panc...

Case Number: 573

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited & Others V/S Mr. Col Surinder Singh & Others

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/574/20161. Mr. Col Surinder Singh & Othersut...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited & Othersut ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT D...

Case Number: 574

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Wing Commander Vishal Khanna

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav Adv., Vineet Yadav Adv. & Neha Yadav Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:577 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Wing Commander Vishal Khanna S/o Dr. PranNath Khanna R/o K-20, First Floor, Lajpat Nagar III, New Delhi – 110024..........Comp...

Case Number: 577

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Gurwinder Bhatia

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav Adv., Vineet Yadav Adv. & Neha Yadav Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:578 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Gurwinder Bhatia W/o Tej Paul Bhatia, R/o Cypress Street Animal Hospital, 1893, Cornwall Ave, Vancover B.C., V6J 1C6, Canada...........

Case Number: 578

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Tej Paul Singh Bhatia

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav Adv., Vineet Yadav Adv. & Neha Yadav Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:579 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Tej Paul Singh Bhatia, S/o L. S. Rajinder Singh Bhatia R/o Cypress Street Animal Hospital, 1893, Cornwall Ave, Vancover B.C., V6J 1C...

Case Number: 579

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Neelam Kaushal & Others

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav Adv. & Vineet Yadav Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/580/20161. Neelam Kaushal & Othersut...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., & Othersut............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER ...

Case Number: 580

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Mrs. Renu Bala

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Roshan Lal Goyal Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:583 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Mrs. RenuBala wife of Sh. Sushil Kumar Jain, aged about 47 years, GHS-91, Flat No.205, Sector-20, Panchkula, Haryana..........Compla...

Case Number: 583

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sushila Devi

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:593 of 2016Date of Institution:15.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Sushila Devi w/o Sh. Kitab Singh, H.No.505, Sector 7-B, Chandigarh..........Complainant VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO No....

Case Number: 593

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bhal Singh

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:594 of 2016Date of Institution:15.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Bhal Singh S/o Sh. Ishwar Singh R/o Flat No.603, 6th Floor, G.H.S. No.3, The Himalaya Employees Group Housing Society, Sector-23, Pa...

Case Number: 594

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajender Parsad

Dlf   Dlf Homes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R.P.Dangi, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

During the pendency of the complaint, possession has been taken over by the complainant. It is stated by Counsel for the complainant that some issues need to be decided qua the amount claimed in excess when possession was offered and qua additional area also. He wishes to withdra...

Case Number: 549

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.