Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AR Takkar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No. MA/614/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/767/20161. Lt. Col. Jitender Bhakar Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE M...
Case Number: 614
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AR Takkar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No. MA/615/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/766/20161. Bimla DeviUt...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. LtdUt...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 615
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AR Takkar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No. MA/616/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/754/20161. Virender KaushalChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...
Case Number: 616
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AR Takkar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No. MA/617/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/756/20161. Dev Raj PrasharChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...
Case Number: 617
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARDEEP SOLATH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No : 235 of 2016Date of Institution: 18.08.2016Date of Decision : 22.12.20161. Parminder Kaur w/o Sh. Harinder Singh Bhangoo, Resident of House No.1170, TDI City, Sector-110, Landran Road, Mohali (Punjab).2...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P. Dangi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:500 of 2016Date of Institution:23.08.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Rajender Singh S/o Sh. Rati Ram, Resident of H.No.215, Sector – 22A, Near Kiran Cinema, Chandigarh – 160022. .........C...
Case Number: 500
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P.Dangi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:501 of 2016Date of Institution:23.08.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Sunita Dangi D/o Sh. Bhal Singh, Wife of Sh. R.P. Dangi, Resident of H.No.240, Sector-22/A, Chanidgarh. .........Complainants. Vers...
Case Number: 501
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:516 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Col. Akshay Mankotia, S/o Sh. K.S. Mankotia, r/o 38/5, Shankar Vihar, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi-110010 currently residing at #497 Int &...
Case Number: 516
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:575 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Mr. Raj Kumar Garg son of Late Shri Sawan Ram Garg, Resident of Flat No.202, GH-18, MDC, Sector-5, Panchkula.Sanjeev Garg son of Shr...
Case Number: 575
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:576of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Mr. Vijay Kumar son of Late Shri Govind Ram Mehta, resident of H.No.44C-Block, Sirsa, Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes...
Case Number: 576
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.