Development Board
Latest Judgments
Total 248 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Board.
SARJERAO M. THOMARE V/S PUNE HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD . CHIEF OFFICER & ORS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
U.P HOUING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR V/S DINESH KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND GARG
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2017 IN RP/1857/20141. DINESH KUMAR...........Appellants(s)Versus1. U.P HOUING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI,PRESIDING MEMBER ...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Chief Executive Officer, Amravati Housing And Area Development Board ( HUdoco) Amravti V/S Mangesh Madhukar Gorle
Court Name: Washim
Appelant Advocate Adv. S.V. Gattani
Respondant Advocate Adv.D.G.Dhoble
JudgmentFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/29/20151. Mangesh Madhukar GorleAt. Plot No. E-12 , HUdoco Colony, Mangrulpir, Dist-WashimWashimMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Chief Executive Officer, Amravati Housing And Area Development Board ( HUdoco) Amravti Amravati Ho...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Board V/S Mrs. Sai M. Dalvi
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/09/1651. Mrs. Sai M. Dalvi6/19, Shubhmangal C.H.S., Shrirang Sabade Marg, Siddharth Nagar, Goregaon-West, Mumbai-104....
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2016
U P Housing Development Board V/S Harjeet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Verma
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2011/1107(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Harjeet Singh a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. U P Housing Develop...
Case Number: 2011
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2016
Livestock Development Board V/S Raj Singh S/o Nanhu Ram
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate L.K. Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.464 of 2015 Instituted on: 11.12.2015 Date of order: 11.08.20161. Raj Singh son of Nanhu Ram Resident of Village Baiayanpur, Tehsil and District Sonepat.…Complainant.Versus1. Livestock Developme...
Case Number: 464
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2016
HARIVITTHAL TIMAJI GHUGUSKAR V/S NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. C.M. SHROFF & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 02/03/2016 in Appeal No. 175/2015 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARDNEAR MLA HOSTEL CIVIL LINES NAGPUR,NAGPURMAHARASHTR...
Case Number: 2006
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
JAIPRAKASH NARAYAN ZIRMIRE V/S NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. C.M. SHROFF & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2007 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 02/03/2016 in Appeal No. 176/2015 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARDNEAR MLA HOSTEL CIVIL LINES NAGPUR,NAGPURMAHARASHTR...
Case Number: 2007
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
DR.JAIPRAKASH NARAYAN ZIRMIRE V/S NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate HITESH N.VERMA
Respondant Advocate In Person
...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2016
SHRI.HARIVITTHAL TIMAJI GHUGUSKAR V/S NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate HITESH N.VERMA
Respondant Advocate Adv. Kamdi
...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.