Development Board
Latest Judgments
Total 249 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Board.
Pepsu Townships Development Board V/S Harry Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2019
President Madhya Pradesh Housing & Infrastructure Development Board V/S Umashankar Trivedi
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2019
Gujarat Rural Welfare Development Board V/S Kalubha Mahipatsinh Gohil
Court Name: Bhavnagar
Appelant Advocate D.V.TRIVEDI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2019
MUMBAI HOUSING AREA AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD (MHADB) V/S ANKUSH BHIKAJI OVAL
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate SURESH BABU
Respondant Advocate
Addl. Mumbai Suburban District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Execution Application No. EA/18/118( Date of Filing : 27 Nov 2018 )InComplaint Case No. RBT/CC/12/3871. ANKUSH BHIKAJI OVAL1201 TIRUPATI CHS PLOT NO ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2019
SUKRAM R.KOLI V/S THE ESTATE MANAGER,KONKAN HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV.S.CHANDRASHEKHAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2019
UP HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD V/S RAMESH CHANDRA AGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL (AMICUS CURIAE)
Respondant Advocate MRS.VEERA KAUL SINGH, RIDHIMA SINGH, PANKAJ SINGH, GAURAV SINGH, RIDHIMA SINGH, VISHWAJIT SINGH, PANKAJ SINGH & PIYUSH VATSA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2631 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 28/04/2015 in Appeal No. 959/1995 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAMESH CHANDRA AGARWALS/O. SHRI MOHAN LAL AGARWAL R/O. DHARAM NIWAS, CIVIL LINES, DISTRIC...
Case Number: 2631
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2018
KONKAN HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (MHADA). V/S MR. RAMESH JANU KOLHATKAR.
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate SHRI. S.R CHANDRE.
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2018
MUMBAI HOUSING AREA AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD (MHADB) V/S ANKUSH BHIKAJI OVAL
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate ADV.LEO CARDOZ
Respondant Advocate Adv.Manoj P.Mhatre
Addl. Mumbai Suburban District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/12/3871. ANKUSH BHIKAJI OVAL3,SARINE HOUSE,MAZAGAON DOCK OFFICERS COMPANY QUARTERS,DOCKYARD ROAD, MUMBAI-400 010 MUMBAIMAHA...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2019
THE CHAIRMAN/CHIEF OFFICER OF MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD V/S SHRI. PRAMOD S/O NATTHUJI PAUNIKAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. M.M. VINDHURKAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/15/472( Date of Filing : 03 Sep 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/07/2015 in Case No. CC/347/2013 of District Nagpur)1. SHRI. PRAMOD S/O NATTHUJI PAUNIKARR/O C/O RAMESH SELUKAR ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2018
UTTAR PRADESH HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD V/S HARPAL SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHISH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MS. VEERA KAUL SINGH, MS. RIDHIMA SINGH, MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH & MR. GAURAV SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2728 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/01/2016 in Appeal No. 2194/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. HARPAL SINGHS/O. KHACHERU SINGH, AT PRESENT R/O. A 62/245, PERVESH VIHAR, GARH ROAD,MEER...
Case Number: 2728
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.