Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL DUTT SALWAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2644 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/09/2012 in Appeal No. 1755/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) WITH IA/4254/2014,IA/4255/20141. M.P. HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARDTHROUGH ...
Case Number: 2644
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL DUTT SALWAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2644 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/09/2012 in Appeal No. 1755/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) WITH IA/4254/2014,IA/4255/20141. M.P. HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARDTHROUGH ...
Case Number: 2645
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL DUTT SALWAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2644 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/09/2012 in Appeal No. 1755/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) WITH IA/4254/2014,IA/4255/20141. M.P. HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARDTHROUGH ...
Case Number: 2646
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravindra Nagare
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/04/1358(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/04/2004 in Case No. cc/272/2002 of District Amravati)1. Gajanan Pandurang Na...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravindra Nagarae
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/04/1362(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/04/2004 in Case No. cc/267/2002 of District None)1. Sahebrao Gopalrao Deshmu...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.KASTURE
Respondant Advocate H.N.VARMA
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/1666/04(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/04/2004 in Case No. CPA/266/2002 of District Akola )1. ARCHANA SHRIRAM KALME...
Case Number: 1666
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 87 OF 20141. DR. DEWAKAR GOEL,S/o late Shri Daya Prakash Goel, 4051, Joy Apartments, Plot No. 2, Sector-2, Dwarka,NEW DELHI - 110075............Complainant(s)Versus1. COMMISSIONER (HOUSING) UP HOUSING AND ...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.G.Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/03/1402(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. Miscellaneous Application No. of District None)1. Girjashankar...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4186 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/01/2012 in Appeal No. 32/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. BHAGWAN NIMBWALE & ANR.19, New Shivaji Nagar, Abhaynagar Road, Rameswari Ring RoadNAGPUR - 24...
Case Number: 4186
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2014
Court Name: Chhatarpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.