Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY / VICE PRESIDENT V/S MAHAVEER SINGH
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2022
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS V/S ASHMA ANSARI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SATPAL DHAMIJA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First Appeal No.1241 of 2018Date of the Institution:06.11.2018Date of Final Hearing: 12.09.2022Date of pronouncement: 15.12.2022Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, C-3, HUDA Complex Sector-6, Pa...
Case Number: 304
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2023
Smt Shamshad Bani V/S Muradabad Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sharma, Shri. Abhishek Misra
Respondant Advocate T.H.Naqvi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/2286( Date of Filing : 30 Dec 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Muradabad Development Authoritya.....
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2022
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Krishan Pal Singh
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 172
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2022
Rajesh Mohan Sarkar V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Atul Kumar Singh
Respondant Advocate A K SRIVASTAV
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/371( Date of Filing : 27 Feb 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Gorakhpur Development Authoritya......
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2022
Meerut Development Authority V/S Om Prakash Goyal
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma
Respondant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi & Ram Raj
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/432/2018( Date of Filing : 27 Dec 2018 )1. Om Prakash GoyalGhaziabadGhaziabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Meerut Development AuthorityMeer...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2022
Meerut Development Authority V/S Anurag Goyal
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma
Respondant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi & Ram Raj
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/433/2018( Date of Filing : 27 Dec 2018 )1. Anurag GoyalGhaziabadGhaziabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Meerut Development AuthorityMeerutMe...
Case Number: 433
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2022
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Sukhpal Sharma
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2022
Kanpur Development Authority V/S Smt. Nirmala Devi
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Pandey
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/892/2022( Date of Filing : 05 Sep 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2022 in Case No. C/2009/824 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Smt. Nirmala Devi...
Case Number: 892
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2022
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2022
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Diwakar Sarkar
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2003
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.