Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Ghaziabad Development Authority And Others V/S Rajesh Kumar
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Anil Babu
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 241
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2020
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2022
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority V/S Sanjeev Kumar Gaddi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vansh Malhotra
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2022
Kanpur Development Authority V/S kanti Singh
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2022
Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) V/S Parmod Aneja
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Sandeep Aneja
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2022
Ram Bachan V/S Kanpur Development Authority
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1998/2357( Date of Filing : 19 Sep 1998 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/1997 in Case No. C/826/1993 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Kanpur Developme...
Case Number: 1998
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-1998
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2022
KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (KDA) V/S PERVEZ AMIN & 47 ORS.
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWARYA SINHA & PRIYANKA SINHA
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 310 OF 20121. PERVEZ AMIN & 47 ORS.S/o. Mr. A.U. Khan, R/o. Flat No. 15, Chandraganga Apartment, Jajmau,Kanpur -208 010...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (KDA)Thorugh Its Vice C...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2022
Kanpur Development Authority V/S NEELAM GUPTA
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate KAMAL KUMAR MAURYA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 739
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2022
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Smt.Kanta
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate S.K.Sahu
Respondant Advocate Man Mohan Sharma
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2022
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Sh. Harpreet Singh Sidhu
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Nikhil Saraf
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:376/2020Date of Institution:24.08.2020Date of Decision:14.09.2022Sh.Harpreet Singh Sidhu s/o Sh.Karampal Singh Sidhu, House No.924, Sector 39-A (Near Punjab Circuit House), Chandigarh -160036....
Case Number: 376
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2022
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority / BDA (Bathinda Development Authority). V/S Dev Raj
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sahil Garg
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:970 of 2021Date of Institution:21.12.2021Date of Decision:14.09.2022Dev Raj s/o Late Sh.Sadhu Ram, aged 70 years, Advocate, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh & Resident of H.no.1...
Case Number: 970
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.